Unbiased AI-powered news
The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit will review whether Washington’s anti-discrimination law can limit a religious ministry’s ability to hire only co-religionists for non-ministerial roles.
Washington ExaminerU.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit agreed to rehear en banc Yakima Union Gospel Mission v. Washington, a case that tests whether the Washington Law Against Discrimination can restrict a religious organization’s hiring practices.
The full court’s vote vacates a three-judge panel ruling that had sided with the mission. U.S. Circuit Judge Patrick Bumatay, who wrote the panel opinion, issued a dissent joined by Judges Lawrence VanDyke and Eric Tung.
The Washington Law Against Discrimination prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and provides a religious exemption only for non-ministerial employees. Yakima Union Gospel Mission argues that the statute unconstitutionally prevents it from limiting IT-department hires to individuals who share its religious beliefs.
A federal district court ruled in favor of the mission before the state appealed.
The three-judge panel upheld that decision. “Hiring based on religious criteria may conflict with laws prohibiting employment decisions based on protected characteristics. Ordinarily, even religious institutions must follow generally applicable employment law,” Bumatay wrote in the panel opinion.
“But if state law were to prevent religious institutions from employing only co-religionists, those institutions could be forced to hire employees who openly flout and disagree with their religious principles,” he added. “This, the First Amendment doesn’t tolerate.
Because who a religious organization hires may go to the very character of its religious mission, the church autonomy doctrine protects the decision to hire co-religionists for nonministerial roles if that decision is based on the organization’s sincerely held religious beliefs,” Bumatay stated.
In his dissent from the en banc order, Bumatay criticized what he described as the 9th Circuit’s “alarming trend” of not safeguarding religious freedom rights. “The Ninth Circuit has relegated religious liberty to a second-class right. In case after case, our court has condoned governmental interference with the rights of the religious to practice their faith as they believe,” he wrote.
“Now, with this en banc vote, we continue down this disturbing path. In what is likely a foregone conclusion, our court steps toward endorsing the view that States can force a religious organization to hire individuals who openly flout its religious beliefs and teachings,” Bumatay stated. “Perhaps I’m wrong, in which case I will celebrate the win for the First Amendment.
But given our court’s track record, I have doubts,” he added. Bumatay, VanDyke, and Tung were all appointed by President Donald Trump. The Supreme Court’s most recent religious-liberty ruling cited in the coverage is Chiles v.
Salazar, in which the Court sided with a religious counselor challenging Colorado’s counseling restrictions.
Single source — no framing comparison available.
abcnews.go.comPresident Trump delivered a 26-minute address from the White House East Room on July 16, 2026, alleging vulnerabilities to foreign hacking and calling for the SAVE America Act. Democrats rejected the claims as baseless while some Republicans backed the legislation push.
abcnews.go.comThe Trump administration stated that states must implement election security measures including secure voting machines and cleaned voter rolls or lose federal funding. President Donald Trump delivered a White House address announcing declassification of related intelligence repor…
abcnews.go.comTrump spoke from the White House East Room on July 16. Several broadcast networks declined to carry the remarks live on television.