science
Analysis Shows U.S. Foreign Aid Under Trump Administration Directed More Funds to U.S.-Based Contractors
A new analysis indicates that the Trump administration's overhaul of foreign aid programs allocated millions more dollars to large U.S.-based contractors. Organizations in developing countries received nearly no funding during this period. The changes affected aid distribution, including programs in locations such as Borno, Nigeria, where U.S.-based nonprofits operated outpatient services.
Apr 6, 10:57 AM·2m read1 source
Substrate placeholder — needs reviewAudio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
The Trump administration implemented changes to U.S. foreign aid programs that resulted in increased funding for large contractors based in the United States, according to a new analysis. These contractors, including major aid agencies, received substantial infusions of cash.
In contrast, organizations located in developing countries were allocated nearly no funds under the revised system. The analysis highlights how the overhaul prioritized U.S.-based entities in the distribution of aid dollars. This shift occurred amid broader efforts to restructure foreign assistance, focusing on efficiency and alignment with administration priorities.
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), referenced in prior discussions, had identified certain aid agencies as inefficient, though the analysis does not detail specific DOGE actions in the funding decisions.
An example of the aid programs involved is an outpatient therapeutic program in Borno, Nigeria, operated by FHI360, a nonprofit organization based in North Carolina. Women and children in the region waited to receive nutrition treatment and therapeutic food at this facility.
Such programs demonstrate how U.S.-based contractors continued to deliver services on the ground despite the funding shifts. The analysis, conducted by an independent entity, examined financial data from the period of the overhaul. It found that millions of additional dollars flowed to big U.S.-based contractors, while local organizations in recipient countries faced significant reductions.
This pattern raises questions about the long-term effectiveness of aid delivery, though the report focuses on factual allocations rather than outcomes.
aid constitutes a key component of U.S. international engagement, supporting health, nutrition, and development initiatives worldwide. The Trump administration's changes, enacted during its term, aimed to streamline spending but led to concentrated funding among fewer, larger recipients.
