arXiv Introduces One-Year Ban for Papers With Unchecked LLM-Generated Content

ArXiv will ban authors for one year and require future submissions to be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue if a paper contains incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation. The popular platform for preprint academic research announced the policy to reduce the volume of papers that include AI slop.

Thomas Dietterich, arXiv’s section chair of its computer science section, detailed the penalties on X. He cited the platform’s Code of Conduct, which states that by signing your name as an author of a paper, each author takes full responsibility for all its contents, irrespective of how the contents were generated.

Dietterich explained that if generative AI tools generate inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content, and that output is included in scientific works, it is the responsibility of the author(s).

"If a submission contains incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation, this means we can’t trust anything in the paper," he stated.

The penalty is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue. ” or “the data in this table is illustrative, fill it in with the real numbers from your experiments”. Authors can appeal ban decisions.

The policy will only apply to cases of incontrovertible evidence. The internal process requires first a moderator to document the problem and then for the Section Chair to confirm before imposing the penalty. In 2025, arXiv updated its policies to only allow computer science review articles and position papers to be published if they have been peer reviewed and accepted at a conference or a journal.