science
Climate Change Denial Conference Held Near White House in Washington
A conference organized by the Heartland Institute took place near the White House, attracting dozens of attendees who question the scientific consensus on climate change. The event featured presentations, including one by William Happer, a Princeton University professor emeritus of physics. Happer has stated that global warming benefits humanity.
Substrate placeholder — needs reviewAudio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
The Heartland Institute hosted its International Climate Change Conference in Washington on Wednesday. The event drew dozens of participants who reject the established scientific consensus on climate change. It occurred near the White House amid discussions on environmental policy.
William Happer, a professor emeritus of physics at Princeton University, delivered a presentation at the conference. Happer has argued that global warming provides benefits to humanity. The conference provided a platform for such views during a period of shifting federal priorities on climate issues.
The scientific consensus, as outlined by organizations including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, holds that human activities contribute significantly to global warming. Attendees at the Heartland Institute event expressed opposition to this consensus. The gathering reflects ongoing debates in policy circles regarding climate science and regulation.
The Heartland Institute has organized similar conferences in past years to promote skepticism toward mainstream climate science.
This year's event aligns with broader conversations in Washington about environmental regulations and energy policy. Participants included researchers, policymakers, and advocates focused on alternative interpretations of climate data. The conference's location near the White House underscores its proximity to federal decision-making centers.
It took place as the incoming administration prepares to address climate-related initiatives. Affected parties include environmental groups, energy sectors, and communities vulnerable to climate impacts, who monitor such events for potential policy shifts. Next steps may involve follow-up discussions or publications from the conference.
Organizers could seek to influence legislative or regulatory agendas. The event highlights tensions between scientific consensus and dissenting viewpoints in public discourse.
