Estée Lauder Sues Jo Malone and Zara Over Perfume Collaboration Using Designer's Name
Estée Lauder has filed a lawsuit against British perfume designer Jo Malone and retailer Zara, alleging unauthorized use of Malone's name in a new fragrance collaboration. The suit claims trademark infringement and breach of contract. Jo Malone expressed hope that the dispute will resolve sensibly.
designboom.comEstée Lauder Cos. Inc. has initiated legal action against Jo Malone and the fashion retailer Zara in a New York federal court. The lawsuit centers on a limited-edition perfume collaboration between Jo Malone and Zara, which Estée Lauder claims violates trademark rights and a prior agreement.
The collaboration, launched in select Zara stores, features products bearing the Jo Malone name. Estée Lauder, which owns the Jo Malone London brand acquired in 1999, argues that the use of Malone's name without permission constitutes infringement. The company seeks an injunction to halt sales of the products and damages for alleged harm to its brand.
Jo Malone, the designer who founded the brand before its sale, is named as a defendant alongside Zara.
the Dispute Jo Malone CBE founded Jo Malone London in 1994 and sold it to Estée Lauder in 1999 while retaining certain rights to use her name in personal endeavors.
The lawsuit alleges that the Zara collaboration breaches these terms by commercializing her name in the fragrance sector. Zara, part of the Inditex group, described the project as a one-time creative partnership with Malone. Estée Lauder stated that the action protects its intellectual property investments in the Jo Malone brand, which generates significant revenue annually.
The perfumes in question were released in Europe and the UK in late 2023, priced between 30 and 60 euros.
“I hope sense will prevail in this matter.”
" — Jo Malone, October 2024 (BBC News) Zara has not publicly commented on the lawsuit beyond confirming the collaboration's nature. Estée Lauder emphasized in court filings that the dispute involves clear contractual obligations dating back to the 1999 acquisition. U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York. Legal experts note that such celebrity endorsement disputes often hinge on the scope of retained naming rights post-acquisition.
Transparency
2 independent outlets report the same core facts. This score blends how many outlets corroborate, their editorial tier, and how closely their facts agree — it measures corroboration, not proof.
Story details
Related Stories
interestingengineering.comIRGC Claims Ballistic Missile Strikes Hit U.S. Bases in Kuwait
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said it carried out the attacks in retaliation for prior U.S. strikes on Qeshm Island. The strikes occurred the same night the statement was released.
upi.comSouth Koreans Vote in Nationwide Local Elections Testing Lee Government
Voters across South Korea cast ballots Wednesday for mayors, governors, local council members and education chiefs in races viewed as an early gauge of support for President Lee Jae Myung’s administration. More than 44.6 million people were eligible to vote at 14,288 polling stat…
ESPNInjured Cubs Pitchers Cabrera and Boyd Nearing Returns After Mixed Results This Season
Edward Cabrera is expected to start this weekend and Matthew Boyd is set for a second rehab start Saturday. Both pitchers have been sidelined by injuries this season.