Eswar Prasad Argues for Effective Management of Globalization to Counter Fragmentation

Eswar S. Prasad, an economist and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, has argued in a Foreign Affairs article that globalization remains a viable force against global fragmentation and conflict when managed properly. He notes that globalization's original promise included fostering economic interdependence to reduce international disputes.

According to Prasad, recent challenges such as trade wars and supply chain disruptions have tested this framework, but effective policies could revive its benefits.

Prasad points to historical context where globalization promoted growth and stability post-World War II through institutions like the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund. He describes how these mechanisms facilitated cross-border trade, investment, and technology transfer, benefiting economies worldwide.

However, @ForeignAffairs reported that rising protectionism and geopolitical rivalries, including U.S.-China tensions, have led to fragmentation in global supply chains since the 2010s.

The stakes involve multiple parties, including developing nations that rely on export-led growth and multinational corporations facing regulatory hurdles. Prasad highlights that ineffective management could exacerbate inequalities, with smaller economies suffering most from disrupted trade flows.

He advocates for reforms such as diversified supply chains and multilateral agreements to mitigate these risks.

Looking ahead, Prasad suggests that governments and international bodies should prioritize inclusive policies, such as addressing labor standards and environmental concerns in trade deals. @ForeignAffairs reported his view that without such measures, globalization risks further decline amid events like the COVID-19 pandemic, which exposed vulnerabilities in global health and economic systems.