Unbiased AI-powered news
The Food and Drug Administration has withdrawn a proposed rule that would have prohibited people under 18 from using indoor tanning devices. The withdrawal, dated March 16, also removed a requirement for users to sign a form acknowledging health risks including cancer. The action follows public comments on the rule first proposed in 2015.
Los Angeles TimesThe rule, first proposed in 2015, drew more than 9,000 public comments. Physicians and cancer research organizations supported the measure while tanning bed industry representatives and business owners opposed it. " Officials at the Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to questions about the specific concerns referenced.
Indoor tanning is associated with a 75 percent increase in melanoma risk for those who begin use before age 35. One study found that tanning beds accelerate DNA mutations even in areas of the body not typically exposed to sunlight, leading to a nearly threefold increase in lifetime melanoma risk.
Melanoma diagnosis rates have increased 46 percent in the last decade. The World Health Organization classifies UV-emitting tanning beds as a Group 1 carcinogen, in the same category as tobacco and asbestos. Tanning devices emit UVA and UVB radiation at levels far exceeding natural sunlight.
A single session can deliver UVB exposure comparable to noon at the equator while delivering roughly 15 times the UVA radiation found anywhere on Earth's surface.
Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have banned indoor tanning for people under 18. Roughly two dozen additional states impose some restrictions, such as requiring parental permission or limiting access for younger children. Implementation of these state rules varies.
Dermatologists there report treating former tanning bed users in their 20s and 30s for advanced melanoma. Australia and Brazil have banned cosmetic indoor tanning for all ages. Most western European countries and most Canadian provinces prohibit minors from using tanning devices.
The proposed federal rule focused on age as a risk factor because tanning before age 35 carries elevated melanoma risk. Dermatologists have noted that skin damage from ultraviolet exposure accumulates over a lifetime, with early exposure appearing to play a larger role in later cancer risk.
Some adherents of the Make America Healthy Again movement have promoted regular sun exposure, including advice on social media to forgo sunscreen and develop tolerance to sunlight. The Skin Cancer Foundation states that it is not possible to build tolerance to sun exposure and that no such thing as a "solar callus" exists.
The withdrawal occurred after the individual nominated to lead the Department of Health and Human Services posted on X before the 2024 election about ending what he described as the FDA's suppression of certain therapies including sunshine. That individual was photographed leaving a tanning salon in Washington last year.
Single source — no framing comparison available.
theconservativetreehouse.comBiotech firms are pressing the White House to exclude treatments for rare diseases from two Medicare pilot programs that lower brand drug prices. The Rare Disease Company Coalition met last week with the Office of Management and Budget to discuss the request.
BBC NewsNovo Nordisk filed suit Tuesday alleging Eli Lilly used outdated trial data in ads for Zepbound and Mounjaro. The complaint seeks an injunction and corrective advertising.
hothardware.comSpectral analysis of 2024 and 2025 observations revealed helium escaping from the planet 48 light-years away. The results, published in Science, confirm LHS 1140 b as the first known rocky world in a habitable zone that retains an atmosphere.