politics
Federal Judge Denies University's Summary Judgment Motion in UT Austin Protest Suspension Lawsuit
Judge Robert Pitman of the Western District of Texas issued a decision in Qaddumi v. Davis, denying summary judgment on issues related to a student's campus suspension. The ruling addresses the University of Texas's cancellation of a pro-Palestine protest in April 2024. The court applied the Tinker standard to viewpoint-based restrictions at universities.
Lynn Dobson-Keeble / Wikimedia (Public domain)Audio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
# Texas Judge Denies Summary Judgment in University Protest Suspension Case Judge Robert Pitman of the Western District of Texas issued a decision in the case Qaddumi v. Davis on April 14, 2026. The decision denies summary judgment on the issues.
Qaddumi challenges his suspension in the case. The court assumed that the Tinker substantial disruption standard applies to viewpoint-based restrictions at universities. Speech may be a substantial and material disruption if it is likely to incite or produce imminent lawless action, including violations of reasonable university rules or substantial interference to others' education.
Inciting others to protest in violation of a directive not to conduct a protest, without violation of another university policy, would not constitute inciting others to violate a reasonable university rule.
April 2024 Protest Cancellation The University of Texas ordered the April 2024 protest cancelled.
The cancellation was based on PSC's messaging on social media. The cancellation was based specifically because PSC's messaging aligned with that of SJP, a national pro-Palestine group. Students not from PSC were not restricted from protesting at the same time and in the same place and manner on April 24, 2024.
UT Dean of Students Katie McGee testified that the decision to cancel the protest was based on anticipated violations of university rules and safety considerations. PSC's messaging on social media said that we will take back our university and force our administration to divest, in the footsteps of SJP chapters at other universities.
to Other Protests UT officials have not preemptively canceled similar protests sharing other viewpoints.
UT has not made mass arrests of students or barred students from campus based on demonstrations similar in time, place, and manner. Hartzell testified that he did not think he had preemptively cancelled any other protest. Qaddumi is one of very few UT Austin students who have ever been barred from campus for demonstration activity.
