Substrate
politics

Former FBI Director James Comey Indicted on Charges Related to 2025 Instagram Post

Former FBI Director James Comey faced indictment on charges of threatening President Trump through a 2025 Instagram post showing seashells arranged as '86 47.' Trump described the post as a mob term implying harm, while Comey denied any intent and called the prosecution politically motivated. Comey made an initial court appearance on April 29, 2026, without entering a plea.

The Hill
AB
Nbc News
Bbc
The New York Times
Reason
6 sources·Apr 29, 9:45 PM(5 days ago)·3m read
Former FBI Director James Comey Indicted on Charges Related to 2025 Instagram PostFBI / Wikimedia (Public domain)
Audio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.

Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted on two federal charges in connection with a 2025 Instagram post, according to court documents unsealed in North Carolina. The post showed a photo of seashells arranged on a beach to form the numbers "86 47," accompanied by a caption that read "cool shell formation," per the indictment filed in the Eastern District of Virginia.

Prosecutors stated in the charging document that "86" is slang for getting rid of something and that "47" refers to Donald Trump as the 47th president, alleging the combination conveyed a threat against the president. The charges include making threats against the president and transmitting a threat in interstate commerce.

Comey deleted the post after being notified of its potential interpretation, as noted in his statement to authorities.

Comey self-surrendered and appeared in federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia on April 29, 2026, according to court records and statements from his legal team. He did not enter a plea during the initial hearing and was released without conditions.

Accompanied by attorneys Jessica Carmichael and Patrick Fitzgerald, Comey confirmed he understood the charges. His attorneys indicated they plan to file a motion claiming selective and vindictive prosecution by the Justice Department, and they requested the preservation of relevant government materials and public statements.

The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge [name not specified in available sources]. No trial date has been set as of the indictment's unsealing.

" He further asserted that "86 47" meant "kill President Trump" and called Comey a "dirty cop" who lied to the FBI about the post. " He referenced movies depicting mobsters using "86" to order killings. Trump had fired Comey during his first term and previously urged the Department of Justice to prosecute him.

The indictment follows a third assassination attempt on Trump at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner on April 25, 2026, at the Washington Hilton, where the suspect's manifesto, obtained by police, indicated intent to target Trump and administration officials.

Restaurant workers provided context on the term "86" in interviews with NBC News. " David Brungoli, owner of Pavin 86 in New York City, described the threat interpretation as "ridiculous," noting its common use in restaurants to mean an item is unavailable.

" Zach Jensen from the Mob Museum in Las Vegas stated that while some associate it with murder in mob lore, such as "8 miles out and 6 feet under," it lacks documented ties to organized crime and is mainly metaphorical.

Other instances of "86" usage were noted in public contexts. Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer displayed "86 45" during a 2020 interview, referring to then-President Trump as the 45th president. Conservative commentator Jack Posobiec posted "86 46" during Joe Biden's presidency, referring to him as the 46th president.

Prosecutors must prove that Comey knew the post would be interpreted as a threat, according to a 2023 Supreme Court ruling in Counterman v. Colorado, which requires evidence of subjective understanding for true threats. The case is Comey's second indictment; a prior 2025 case involving false statements and obstruction related to 2020 congressional testimony was dismissed due to issues with the prosecutor's appointment.

The current prosecution is under Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who assumed the role after Trump removed Pam Bondi. Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas) described the indictment as "a stretch" in a statement. Law professor Jonathan Turley wrote in an opinion piece that it was "facially unconstitutional" without additional facts.

Reason magazine characterized the case as an example of vindictive prosecution, citing Comey's history of public criticism from Trump. The U.S. government has not publicly released evidence documenting Comey's intent beyond the post's content and slang interpretation.

No public comments from Comey's former FBI colleagues on the indictment were reported as of April 29, 2026.

Key Facts

Two charges
against Comey for threats and transmitting threat
86 47
seashells post interpreted as threat to Trump
April 29, 2026
Comey's court appearance without plea
Third attempt
assassination on Trump at dinner event
Dismissed prior case
2025 indictment on false statements

Story Timeline

5 events
  1. Apr 29, 2026

    James Comey made an initial court appearance in Virginia after self-surrendering on indictment charges.

    5 sourcesABC · NBCNews · BBCBreaking · The New York Times
  2. Apr 28, 2026

    A federal grand jury in North Carolina indicted Comey over the 2025 Instagram post.

    4 sourcesABC · NBCNews · The Hill · Reason
  3. Apr 25, 2026

    A third assassination attempt on Trump occurred at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner.

    2 sourcesThe Hill · ABC
  4. 2025

    Comey posted the '86 47' seashells image on Instagram and later deleted it.

    6 sourcesThe Hill · ABC · NBCNews · BBCBreaking
  5. 2025

    Comey faced a prior indictment for false statements and obstruction, which was dismissed.

    3 sourcesThe Hill · ABC · BBCBreaking

Potential Impact

  1. 01

    Prosecutors must prove Comey knew the post would be seen as threatening.

  2. 02

    The case tests First Amendment limits on perceived threats in social media.

  3. 03

    Comey's team will file a motion claiming vindictive prosecution by DOJ.

  4. 04

    Trump's comments may influence public perception of the judiciary.

  5. 05

    Similar '86' uses by others may face scrutiny in future cases.

  6. 06

    Criticism could pressure DOJ under Acting AG Todd Blanche.

Transparency Panel

Sources cross-referenced6
Framing risk0/100 (low)
Confidence score97%
Synthesized bySubstrate AI
Word count733 words
PublishedApr 29, 2026, 9:45 PM
Bias signals removed2 across 2 outlets
Signal Breakdown
Loaded 1Framing 1

Related Stories

Spirit Airlines Shuts Down After Failing to Secure $500 Million Federal BailoutThe Free Press
politics1 hr ago

Spirit Airlines Shuts Down After Failing to Secure $500 Million Federal Bailout

Spirit Airlines announced an abrupt shutdown over the weekend, citing surging jet fuel costs from the ongoing war in Iran as the final blow after years of financial struggles. Talks for a $500 million bailout from the Trump administration collapsed, leading to immediate cancellat…

BBC News
The Free Press
RealClearPolitics
NPR
4 sources
Russia Launches Drone and Missile Attacks Despite Ukraine's Unilateral CeasefireFrance 24
politics1 hr ago

Russia Launches Drone and Missile Attacks Despite Ukraine's Unilateral Ceasefire

Russia fired over 100 drones and missiles at Ukraine overnight, killing at least 28 civilians and injuring dozens, hours after Kyiv's unilateral ceasefire began at midnight. Ukrainian officials condemned the strikes as evidence of Moscow's insincerity ahead of Russia's planned pa…

The Guardian
Abc News
BBC News
France 24
NPR
5 sources
Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Mifepristone Access in Louisiana CaseDasfour2022 / Wikimedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)
politics1 hr agoFraming55Framing risk55/100Rewrite exhibits lede misdirection by foregrounding the Supreme Court's procedural stay over the substantive mifepristone access issue, with notable political slant toward Republican challenges.Click to jump to full framing analysis

Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Mifepristone Access in Louisiana Case

The Supreme Court issued an emergency stay restoring nationwide mail and pharmacy access to the abortion pill mifepristone, following a Fifth Circuit ruling that restricted it. The case, brought by Louisiana, centers on standing issues and could force the Trump administration to…

Newsweek
The Guardian
dailykos.com
cbsnews.com
4 sources