House Republicans Hold Hearing on FACE Act Enforcement After Trump DOJ Report
House Republicans convened a hearing on April 28, 2026, to examine the Biden administration's use of the FACE Act. The session followed a Trump DOJ report detailing biased enforcement against pro-life protesters. Witnesses called for the law's repeal, citing unequal sentencing and collusion with activists.
Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America / Wikimedia (CC BY-SA 2.0)House Republicans held a hearing titled 'From Tool to Weapon: The FACE Act and the Dangers of Federalizing Criminal Law' on April 28, 2026, to review the Biden administration's application of the three-decade-old law. The Trump Department of Justice released an 882-page report detailing the Biden administration's use of the FACE Act to imprison nearly two dozen peaceful pro-life protesters, according to The Federalist.
The report found that the Biden administration used 'biased enforcement' of the FACE Act in violation of Americans' rights.
President Donald Trump signed a February 2025 executive order committed to 'Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias'. DOJ investigators initiated a probe after the February 2025 executive order. Communications revealed that the Biden administration colluded with abortion activists who supplied the DOJ with real-time reports of pro-life protest activity, The Federalist reported.
At least four Biden-era prosecutors were fired for their roles in FACE Act enforcement shortly before the report's release. Previously reported data suggested the Biden administration disproportionately focused its FACE Act prosecutions on pro-lifers who prayed, sang, and evangelized at abortion facilities.
The Trump administration’s latest report also determined the Biden DOJ requested and ultimately secured sentences that were longer for pro-lifers — an average of 26.8 months and 14 months respectively — than for other defendants, who averaged 12.3 months and 3 months respectively.
Christopher Ferrara, senior counsel at the Thomas More Society, testified at the hearing. Ferrara has litigated FACE Act defense cases for over 25 years. 'The FACE Act has been used to impose ridiculous injunctions, totally unheard of in any other context.
Speech-free buffer zones, bubble zones, and even floating bubble zones around clinics have created for pro-life advocates and them only what Justice Scalia described … ‘an entirely separate abridged edition of the First Amendment,’' Ferrara continued.
Eva Edl, a 90-year-old survivor of a Yugoslavian communist concentration camp, also testified. The Biden-Harris DOJ prosecuted Edl under the FACE Act in her late 80s for a pro-life protest. 'After all, we have enough laws that if somebody does something wrong, we have the means to punish them.
I plead with our government to stop the killing and go back to the foundational principle that our forefathers built this country on: that all human life has equal value before God,' Edl said.
Thirteen House Judiciary Committee Republicans voted in June 2025 to advance a bill to repeal the FACE Act. As House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan noted, just last week the Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted for shuttling secret fraudulent payments to racist groups, The Federalist reported.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
6 events- 2026-04-28
House Republicans held a hearing titled 'From Tool to Weapon: The FACE Act and the Dangers of Federalizing Criminal Law'.
1 sourceThe Federalist - 2026-04-21
The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted for shuttling $3 million in secret fraudulent payments to informants to foment hate.
1 sourceThe Federalist - 2025-06
Thirteen House Judiciary Committee Republicans voted to advance a bill to repeal the FACE Act.
1 sourceThe Federalist - 2025-02
President Donald Trump signed an executive order committed to 'Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias'.
1 sourceThe Federalist - 2025-02
DOJ investigators initiated a probe after the executive order.
1 sourceThe Federalist - 1990s
The FACE Act was enacted three decades ago.
1 sourceThe Federalist
Potential Impact
- 01
Potential advancement of legislation to repeal the FACE Act in Congress.
- 02
Increased scrutiny on past DOJ practices under Biden, possibly leading to further investigations.
- 03
Changes in enforcement of laws related to protests at clinics, affecting pro-life advocacy.
- 04
Broader implications for federal versus state jurisdiction in criminal matters.
- 05
Possible legal challenges or appeals for those convicted under the FACE Act during Biden's term.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
channelnewsasia.comU.S. Pauses One-Day Ship Guidance in Strait of Hormuz as Iran Talks Advance
President Trump announced a pause in the one-day-old effort to guide ships out of the Strait of Hormuz, citing progress toward an agreement with Iran. Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared the war with Iran concluded after a month-old cease-fire. The U.S. blockade remains in pl…
Spirit Airlines Cancels All Flights and Begins Wind-Down After Failed $500M Bailout Talks
Spirit Airlines announced the immediate wind-down of its operations on Saturday, canceling all flights and stranding passengers and workers. The decision followed the collapse of discussions with the Trump administration for a $500 million bailout. Other U.S. airlines offered res…
Democrats in Congress Urge Trump Administration to Acknowledge Israel's Nuclear Program
A group of Democrats in Congress sent a letter to the U.S. Secretary of State urging public acknowledgment of Israel's nuclear weapons program. The lawmakers cited risks of escalation amid the war in Iran and argued that U.S. silence on the issue affects credibility on global nuc…