Substrate
business

Justice Department Sues Colorado and Denver Over Assault Weapons and Magazine Bans

The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Colorado over its ban on high-capacity magazines and issued a demand that Denver repeal its 37-year-old assault weapons ordinance. Denver officials rejected the demand, stating the law has reduced violent crime and reflects community values.

ZE
The New York Times
The Washington Post
3 sources·May 7, 2:35 AM(3 hrs ago)·3m read
Justice Department Sues Colorado and Denver Over Assault Weapons and Magazine Banszerohedge.com
Audio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.

The Justice Department has sued the state of Colorado over its ban on large-capacity ammunition magazines and separately demanded that Denver repeal its long-standing prohibition on assault weapons. The federal lawsuit against Colorado alleges the state's restriction on magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds violates the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in common use for lawful purposes.

The suit follows a separate action the department filed against Denver on Tuesday targeting the city's ordinance. Denver officials rejected the Justice Department's demand in a letter sent May 4. The city has enforced its assault weapons ban since 1989 and maintains that the measure has withstood legal challenges while helping to keep violent crime rates low.

In response to the April 28 demand letter from the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, city officials stated that reversing the ban would not align with their duty to protect residents. Denver police leadership echoed this position, saying repeal would place officers and residents at greater risk.

It defines such weapons to include any semiautomatic pistol or centerfire rifle with a fixed or detachable magazine capacity of more than 15 rounds, as well as certain semiautomatic shotguns with folding stocks or magazines exceeding six rounds. Modified firearms that function with these features are also covered.

The demand letter cited the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, which affirmed that the Second Amendment protects the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms for self-defense. It argued that arms in common use cannot be categorically banned and noted that the definition encompasses AR-15-style rifles owned by tens of millions of Americans.

The letter set a May 5 deadline for the city to begin negotiations to repeal the ordinance. To avoid litigation, Denver would have been required to stop enforcing the ban, acknowledge its unconstitutionality and enter a consent decree preventing future enforcement.

Colorado's high-capacity magazine ban was enacted after a mass shooting in Aurora. The Justice Department contends both the state and city measures conflict with Second Amendment protections as interpreted by federal courts. Denver officials have defended their law as a democratically enacted public safety measure that has operated effectively for 37 years.

They indicated they may explore other strategies to reduce violence but will not rescind the existing prohibition. The mayor released a statement reinforcing the city's position that the ordinance saves lives and reflects local values. He added that neither a federal demand nor potential lawsuit would alter the city's commitment to the policy.

The federal actions come amid ongoing national debates over gun restrictions following high-profile shootings. The Justice Department has increasingly challenged state and local limits on firearms and accessories under the current administration. Denver's ordinance has faced prior legal challenges but remained in force.

Officials pointed to sustained low violent crime rates in the city as evidence of its effectiveness, though specific comparative data was not detailed in responses to the federal demand. The demand letter emphasized that the banned weapons and features are in widespread lawful ownership nationwide.

It warned that categorical bans on such arms run afoul of constitutional standards established by the Supreme Court. >"Denver’s law has stood for 37 years because it works, it saves lives, and it reflects the values of our community. " — Denver Mayor, May 4 (ZeroHedge via Epoch Times) The state lawsuit separately targets Colorado's magazine restrictions, which the Justice Department described as an unconstitutional burden on lawful self-defense.

Court proceedings in both matters are expected to examine how lower courts have applied recent Second Amendment precedents. At present, the city continues to enforce its ordinance while the federal cases move forward. No immediate changes to gun laws in Denver or Colorado have resulted from the latest actions.

Key Facts

37 years
Denver assault weapons ban in effect since 1989
15 rounds
Threshold for prohibited magazine capacity in both city and state laws
AR-15-style rifles
Explicitly covered by Denver ordinance and cited as arms in common use
Two lawsuits
Filed by DOJ against Colorado and separately against Denver

Story Timeline

5 events
  1. May 4, 2026

    Denver officials sent response letter rejecting Justice Department demand to repeal assault weapons ban.

    2 sourcesZeroHedge · Epoch Times
  2. May 4, 2026

    Denver mayor issued statement defending the 37-year-old ordinance as effective and reflective of community values.

    1 sourceZeroHedge
  3. April 28, 2026

    Justice Department sent demand letter giving Denver until May 5 to negotiate repeal of its assault weapons ban.

    1 sourceZeroHedge
  4. This week

    Justice Department filed lawsuit against Colorado over high-capacity magazine ban.

    3 sourcesNYT · Washington Post · ZeroHedge
  5. Tuesday

    Justice Department filed separate suit against the city of Denver.

    2 sourcesNYT · ZeroHedge

Potential Impact

  1. 01

    Federal court will review Colorado and Denver gun restrictions under current Second Amendment precedents.

  2. 02

    Denver continues enforcing its assault weapons ban while litigation proceeds.

  3. 03

    Outcome could affect similar high-capacity magazine bans in other jurisdictions.

  4. 04

    State and local officials may pursue alternative public safety measures if bans are struck down.

Transparency Panel

Sources cross-referenced3
Framing risk55/100 (moderate)
Confidence score65%
Synthesized bySubstrate AI
Word count645 words
PublishedMay 7, 2026, 2:35 AM
Bias signals removed3 across 2 outlets
Signal Breakdown
Framing 2Loaded 1

Related Stories

Gas Prices Rise 50% Since Start of Iran WarSubstrate placeholder — needs review · Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)
business3 hrs agoUpdated

Gas Prices Rise 50% Since Start of Iran War

Lower-income Americans cut gas use by 7% but still spent 12% more in March as prices rose sharply after the Iran war started Feb. 28. U.S. airlines spent 56.4% more on jet fuel that month, prompting carriers to cut two million seats in May schedules worldwide. The New York Fed re…

fortune.com
cnbc.com
The New York Times
The Guardian
France 24
+4
9 sources
Gap Co-Founder Doris Fisher Dies at 94 Surrounded by Family680news.com
business1 day ago

Gap Co-Founder Doris Fisher Dies at 94 Surrounded by Family

Doris Fisher, who co-founded The Gap Inc. in 1969 with her husband Don, died on May 2, 2026, at age 94. She served as the company's merchandiser for nearly four decades and helped build it into a global brand generating over $15 billion in annual sales. Fisher is survived by thre…

Nbc News
The New York Times
BBC News
New York Post
4 sources
Gap Co-Founder Doris Fisher Dies at 94 in San Franciscosfist.com
business2 days agoUpdated

Gap Co-Founder Doris Fisher Dies at 94 in San Francisco

Doris Fisher, who co-founded the Gap retail chain in 1969, died on Saturday at age 94. She played a key role in building the company into a global brand by focusing on merchandise and style trends like jeans and casual wear. Her death was confirmed by a company spokesman.

The New York Times
New York Post
ABC News
3 sources