Lawsuit Challenges U.S. Seafood Imports from Eight Countries Over Marine Mammal Protection
Environmental groups filed suit Thursday in the U.S. Court of International Trade against the National Marine Fisheries Service. The complaint alleges the agency has not enforced import rules under the 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act for seafood from Argentina, Ecuador, India, Norway, Taiwan, Tunisia, the United Kingdom and Vanuatu.
ecns.cnEnvironmental groups sued the United States government on Thursday to require enforcement of federal rules on imported seafood that may harm whales, dolphins and porpoises. S. Court of International Trade, targets seafood imports from eight countries and claims the National Marine Fisheries Service has not applied standards set by the 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act. S.
vessels. Those protections include seasonal closures, population monitoring and reporting requirements. The complaint states that commercial fisheries in the eight named countries use gillnets, longlines and trawlers that kill marine mammals as incidental catch.
Earthjustice filed the case on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Animal Welfare Institute and the Center for Biological Diversity. The suit challenges imports from Argentina, Ecuador, India, Norway, Taiwan, Tunisia, the United Kingdom and Vanuatu.
It alleges the National Marine Fisheries Service failed to determine whether those countries maintain adequate marine mammal safeguards. Sarah Uhlemann, a staff attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, said bycatch is the largest threat to marine mammals and kills an estimated 650,000 animals each year.
She stated the agency has largely ignored the import requirements since the law took effect. S. fishers that follow the rules face a competitive disadvantage against countries whose fisheries are not held to the same standards. S. seafood consumption.
The National Marine Fisheries Service did not respond to a request for comment on Friday. The suit seeks court orders directing the agency to evaluate the eight countries' fishing practices and to restrict imports where protections are insufficient.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
3 events- 2026-05-22
Center for Biological Diversity filed petition on China shark finning under Moratorium Protection Act.
1 sourceInside Climate News - 2026-05-21
Earthjustice filed suit in U.S. Court of International Trade on behalf of three environmental groups.
1 sourceInside Climate News - 2026-05-23
National Marine Fisheries Service did not respond to request for comment.
1 sourceInside Climate News
Potential Impact
- 01
National Marine Fisheries Service may conduct new reviews of foreign bycatch programs.
- 02
Seafood shipments from the eight countries could face new documentation or volume limits.
- 03
U.S. importers may seek alternative suppliers if restrictions are imposed.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
NprWHO Director Visits Congo as Ebola Outbreak Spreads
The head of the World Health Organization arrived in Kinshasa to support efforts against a rare Ebola strain. Health workers face equipment shortages, community distrust, and armed conflict in affected provinces.
Benzinga Publishes Article on Biotech Stocks During Pandemic Recovery
Benzinga published an article titled 'Best Biotech Stocks Right Now' that addresses the sector's position during global recovery from the pandemic. The piece notes government institutions and professional traders are focusing on biotech companies for vaccine and booster developme…
medpagetoday.comFDA Panel Recommends XFG Variant for Fall Covid Shots
Replimune will submit an application to the FDA for the third time. Pfizer and Innovent Biologics reached a collaboration agreement valued at up to $10.5 billion.