Massachusetts House to Vote on Bill Restricting Social Media Access for Minors and Banning Phones in Schools
The Massachusetts House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on April 8 on legislation that would prohibit children under 14 from using social media platforms and require parental consent for 14- and 15-year-olds. The bill also mandates school districts to prohibit personal electronic devices during the school day.
Substrate placeholder — needs review · Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)The Massachusetts House of Representatives is set to vote on April 8 on a bill that would impose restrictions on social media access for minors and prohibit mobile phone use in schools. The legislation aims to regulate online platforms and educational environments. It follows a Senate version passed in July 2025.
Under the proposed bill, children under 14 would be banned from accessing social media platforms. Platforms would need to install age-verification systems to enforce this restriction. For users aged 14 and 15, verifiable parental consent would be required, while those 16 and older would face no such limits.
Social media platforms are defined in the bill as websites and applications primarily used for sharing user-generated content. Email and SMS text messaging services are explicitly excluded from this definition. If passed, companies would also be required to provide parents access to their children's social media data.
The Attorney General would establish implementation regulations by September 1, with the policy taking effect on October 1, 2026. House Speaker Ron Mariano and Ways and Means Chair Aaron Michlewitz issued a joint statement on the bill.
“The simple reality is that Massachusetts must do more to ensure that our laws keep pace with modern challenges — especially when it comes to protecting our children, and to setting students up for success in the classroom and beyond.”
The bill's social media provisions draw from similar legislation in Florida, enacted in 2024, which has faced legal challenges from First Amendment advocates. Michlewitz noted the potential for litigation but expressed confidence in the state's position.
Governor Maura Healey has indicated support for such measures, including mandatory age verification and disabling features like continuous scrolling for young users in her 2026 State of the Commonwealth address. In addition to social media rules, the bill addresses mobile phone use in schools.
It requires school districts to establish policies prohibiting personal electronic devices throughout the school day, including during school-sponsored activities. A pilot program would test technology to render mobile devices inoperable on school grounds across 10 districts.
Several Massachusetts districts, including Newton, Gardner, and Barnstable, have already implemented local bans on devices. Watertown High School has adopted the "Doorman" program, which limits smartphone functionality to basic voice calls in classrooms, as reported by CBS News.
This makes it the first school in the country to use such a system. After the House vote, the bill would proceed to a six-person conference committee to reconcile differences with the Senate version. The reconciled legislation would require approval from both chambers before reaching Governor Healey's desk for final action.
The measures target protections for minors amid ongoing debates over technology's role in education and child development.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
4 events- April 8, 2025
Massachusetts House votes on bill restricting social media for minors and banning phones in schools.
1 sourceThe Independent - July 2025
Massachusetts Senate passes version of the bill on social media and school device restrictions.
1 sourceThe Independent - 2024
Florida enacts similar social media law for minors, facing subsequent legal challenges.
1 sourceThe Independent - 2026
Governor Healey addresses need for age verification and feature limits for young users.
1 sourceThe Independent
Potential Impact
- 01
School districts could expand device bans, affecting student access during school hours.
- 02
Conference committee may modify bill provisions before final approval.
- 03
Social media companies may need to invest in age-verification systems if the bill passes.
- 04
Potential legal challenges could delay or alter the legislation's implementation.
- 05
Parents would gain access to children's social media data on compliant platforms.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
VarietyMajor Publishers and Author File Copyright Lawsuit Against Meta Over AI Training Data
Five major publishers and author Scott Turow filed a class-action lawsuit against Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg in Manhattan federal court, alleging illegal use of copyrighted books and articles to train the Llama AI model. The suit claims Zuckerberg personally authorized the infr…
naturalnews.comBrockman Testifies on Heated 2017 Dispute with Musk Over OpenAI's For-Profit Shift in Federal Trial
OpenAI President Greg Brockman detailed a heated 2017 confrontation with Elon Musk during testimony in the federal trial Musk v. Altman. He described Musk storming around a table and grabbing a painting after rejecting shared control proposals. The lawsuit seeks $150 billion in d…
Trump Administration Explores Government Review of AI Models Before Public Release
The Trump administration is discussing measures to vet advanced AI models for safety and security risks prior to their release, marking a potential shift from its previous hands-off stance on AI regulation. Officials are considering an executive order to establish a working group…