world
Nigerian Civil Society Groups Support Call for Presidential Intervention in Pension Board Dispute
A coalition of civil society organizations in northern Nigeria has endorsed calls for the president to address a delay in the resumption of the newly appointed chairman of the Military Pension Board. The groups expressed concerns over potential disregard for presidential appointment authority. They cited constitutional implications and drew parallels to past administrative disputes.
Apr 23, 3:31 AM·1m read1 source
Substrate placeholder — needs reviewAudio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
Developing·Limited corroboration so far. This page will refresh as more sources emerge.
A coalition of civil society organizations in northern Nigeria has supported calls for the president to intervene in a dispute involving the Military Pension Board. The issue centers on the delayed resumption of retired Air Vice Marshal Abubakar Idris Adamu, who was appointed as chairman in December.
The groups stated that this situation raises questions about adherence to appointment processes. The coalition, led by the Arewa Renaissance Movement, aligned with a position previously taken by the Security and Public Affairs Analysts Forum. That forum had urged immediate action to allow the appointee to assume office.
The civil society organizations emphasized their support based on the forum's national scope.
Umar, coordinator of the Arewa Renaissance Movement, stated that the group has no personal connection to the appointee. He highlighted that other appointees from the same period have resumed their roles, while this one has not. Umar added that the delay involves defense authorities and could affect perceptions of executive authority.
Umar further noted that the situation implicates constitutional provisions on appointments. He warned that not addressing it might set a precedent for future issues. The coordinator stressed the need to uphold the authority of the commander-in-chief across government and military branches.
referenced a past incident involving the Code of Conduct Tribunal, where the incumbent chairman, Justice Danladi, initially refused to vacate office after a new appointment. He stated that the appointment process was contested, but ultimately, presidential authority prevailed.
