Substrate
technology

Readers Discuss Politeness Toward Voice Assistants and AI Devices

A reader inquiry explores whether people should use polite language with artificial intelligence assistants like Alexa. The question addresses habits of saying 'please' and 'thank you' to devices that do not respond emotionally. Responses from readers are invited on this topic in a long-running series.

The Guardian
1 source·Apr 12, 1:00 PM(23 days ago)·2m read
Readers Discuss Politeness Toward Voice Assistants and AI DevicesSubstrate placeholder — needs review · Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Audio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.

A reader from Toronto has posed a question about interactions with voice assistants and artificial intelligence devices. The inquiry focuses on the practice of using polite phrases such as 'please' and 'thank you' when addressing these technologies.

The reader notes a personal habit of employing such language with an Alexa device despite recognizing that the AI does not have feelings or care about politeness.

This question is part of a long-running series where readers respond to prompts on a variety of subjects. Topics range from lighthearted and imaginative scenarios to deeper scientific and philosophical ideas. The series encourages participation by inviting submissions to address the weekly question.

The current prompt asks whether it is worthwhile to maintain politeness toward artificial assistants. Voice assistants, such as those integrated into smart home systems, process commands through natural language understanding but lack human-like emotional responses. Users often interact with them daily for tasks like setting reminders, playing music, or controlling appliances.

Series The reader response series has been ongoing for years, fostering discussions on diverse themes.

Previous questions have covered hypothetical worlds without human errors and other conceptual explorations. Readers submit their thoughts via email, contributing to published compilations that highlight varied perspectives. Politeness in human-AI interactions raises questions about social norms and technology design.

Some users report feeling more comfortable with courteous language, potentially influencing how AI systems are programmed to encourage positive user experiences. The inquiry highlights a common behavior observed among individuals who treat AI as conversational partners.

assistants become more prevalent in households and workplaces, habits like politeness could affect user satisfaction and adoption rates.

Developers may consider incorporating polite prompts to mirror human etiquette, though the core functionality remains task-oriented. The discussion invites readers to share experiences and views on evolving human-technology relationships. Submissions for responses are directed to a designated email address.

The series continues to publish reader contributions, providing a platform for public input on contemporary issues. This week's focus on AI politeness reflects broader interest in ethical and social dimensions of technology use.

Key Facts

Reader inquiry
from Toronto on AI politeness
Voice assistant example
Alexa used in daily interactions
Series format
long-running reader responses
Topic range
trivial to philosophical concepts

Story Timeline

2 events
  1. April 12, 2026

    Reader from Toronto submits question on politeness to AI assistants.

    1 sourceThe Guardian
  2. Ongoing

    Series publishes reader responses to weekly questions on various subjects.

    1 sourceThe Guardian

Potential Impact

  1. 01

    Series continues to cover technology topics in future editions.

  2. 02

    Increased reader submissions may expand discussions on AI etiquette.

  3. 03

    Public awareness of human-AI interaction norms could influence user behaviors.

Transparency Panel

Sources cross-referenced1
Framing risk0/100 (low)
Confidence score65%
Synthesized bySubstrate AI
Word count350 words
PublishedApr 12, 2026, 1:00 PM
Bias signals removed2 across 1 outlet
Signal Breakdown
Editorializing 1Speculative 1

Related Stories

Major Publishers and Author Sue Meta for Using Copyrighted Works to Train Llama AIinsurancejournal.com
technology2 hrs agoUpdated

Major Publishers and Author Sue Meta for Using Copyrighted Works to Train Llama AI

Five major publishing houses and author Scott Turow filed a lawsuit against Meta in Manhattan federal court, accusing the company of pirating millions of copyrighted works to train its Llama AI models. The suit claims Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg personally authorized the infringemen…

The Independent
fortune.com
The Washington Post
The Guardian
The Verge
+1
6 sources
Samsung Market Cap Tops $1 Trillion as Chip Stocks Rise Amid AI DemandSemafor
ai18 min agoDeveloping

Samsung Market Cap Tops $1 Trillion as Chip Stocks Rise Amid AI Demand

South Korea’s Samsung saw its market capitalization surpass $1 trillion as semiconductor demand rose. SK Hynix hit a record high and Alphabet advanced on a $200 billion Anthropic deal. AI firms DeepSeek and Anthropic pursue large valuations while analysts note sector momentum.

Cnbc
SQ
Semafor
3 sources
Brockman Testifies on Heated 2017 Dispute with Musk Over OpenAI's For-Profit Shift in Federal Trialnaturalnews.com
ai2 hrs agoUpdated

Brockman Testifies on Heated 2017 Dispute with Musk Over OpenAI's For-Profit Shift in Federal Trial

OpenAI President Greg Brockman detailed a heated 2017 confrontation with Elon Musk during testimony in the federal trial Musk v. Altman. He described Musk storming around a table and grabbing a painting after rejecting shared control proposals. The lawsuit seeks $150 billion in d…

The New York Times
Wired
New York Post
BBC News
Business Insider
+4
10 sources