Unbiased AI-powered news
President Trump and Sen. Bernie Sanders both back the idea of the federal government taking equity stakes in major AI companies. Several senators have raised concerns about conflicts of interest and competitive fairness.
SemaforSen. Bernie Sanders is drafting legislation that would impose a one-time 50% tax on large artificial intelligence companies, payable in stock that would be held in a sovereign wealth fund. President Donald Trump has signaled interest in the federal government acquiring equity stakes in AI companies, following earlier moves to take ownership positions in other security-related firms.
NOTUS first reported that Trump administration officials have already discussed the possibility of the government acquiring shares in AI companies with the firms themselves. The proposal has drawn support from Sen. Brian Schatz, who backs the concept of public ownership stakes in AI companies.
Other senators have expressed reservations. Sen. Mike Rounds said taking a stake in one company risks missing out on a more successful competitor. “What I don’t want to do is get stuck with one company or two companies that we’ve got a vested interest in, and then find out that there’s a better company out there that would have a better product, but we’re tied in equity-wise with one company.
So I don’t necessarily care for the idea,” Rounds stated. Sen. Josh Hawley said he does not support “big government owning Big Tech,” but indicated openness to a sovereign wealth fund. “I’m not a huge fan of government ownership where you have big government owning Big Tech.
To me, those are the two worst actors in America, or pretty close, I don’t really want to put them together. What I’d love to do is break up those big companies, introduce more competition, and give everyday working people more control of their data, their own lives. Now, a sovereign wealth fund, on the other hand, that’s a different idea.
That I’m a little bit warmer to,” Hawley stated. Sen. Angus King argued that government ownership would create a “built-in conflict of interest” when regulators consider new rules. “I don’t think that’s the place of the US government to be involved in private companies.
For example, do you pass a regulation that might impinge on the profitability of a company that you own a stake in? It sort of creates a built-in conflict of interest. I just don’t think it’s part of the job of the federal government to own pieces of US companies,” King stated.
Sen. Tim Kaine said he would be open to discussion but is concerned the approach could distort the bidding process for government contracts. Here is the issue. So how do you square something like that with the virtues of the bidding where people ought to be able to compete and if they are the best product, win the competition?
On the DOD side, could there be some upside value? Sure, there could be. So fairness is important,” Kaine stated. m. EDT.
Los Angeles TimesPresident Trump dismissed the remaining members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission this week, leaving all four seats vacant. The agency assists states with voting systems and distributes federal election security grants.
abcnews.go.comA federal appeals court granted a 10-day hold on the Justice Department’s plan to release audio of former President Biden’s interviews with his ghostwriter. The panel will decide by July 20 whether to extend the pause while Biden’s appeal continues.
Reports indicate U.S. officials adjusted plans during the NATO summit in Ankara due to an Iranian assassination threat. Baltic leaders held side meetings with Ukrainian President Zelensky, and Turkish President Erdogan presented ceremonial pistols to visiting leaders.