South Korea Parliament Fails to Pass Constitutional Amendment Bill
A bill to revise the constitution was not voted on Thursday after the main opposition party boycotted the session, falling short of the required quorum. The proposal would have tightened rules on declaring martial law and added references to two pro-democracy protests in the preamble. The presidential office expressed disappointment and urged participation in a follow-up vote scheduled for Friday.
The National Assembly failed to vote on a constitutional amendment bill Thursday after the main opposition party boycotted the plenary session. Only 178 lawmakers participated, short of the 191 needed for a quorum. In the 300-member parliament with 14 vacant seats, a minimum two-thirds of the 286 occupied seats must be present to hold a vote on constitutional changes.
The ruling party holds 152 seats while the main opposition controls 106. The bill, jointly proposed by 187 lawmakers from the ruling party and five minor parties, sought to require the president to obtain parliamentary approval for martial law without delay.
It stipulated that if the National Assembly rejects the declaration or fails to approve it within 48 hours, the martial law would be immediately nullified. The proposal also aimed to include the 1980 pro-democracy uprising in Gwangju and the 1979 Busan-Masan pro-democracy protests in the preamble.
The current text states that the country inherits the spirit of the April 19 revolution in 1960, which overthrew the country's first president over election fraud. The National Assembly plans to hold another plenary session Friday for a second attempt at a vote.
If approved by May 10, a national referendum could be held alongside the June 3 local elections. A constitutional amendment must win both majority turnout and majority approval in the referendum to take effect.
The presidential office expressed disappointment and regret over the scuttled vote. It urged the opposition party to participate in Friday's session. "Lawmakers of the PPP should participate in the vote without fail with a sense of responsibility as constitutional institutions, as another plenary session will be convened tomorrow," a spokesperson said.
"The government will consider ways to accomplish a constitutional revision within the legal and institutional framework," the spokesperson added.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
4 events- May 7, 2026
Parliament convened plenary session at 2 p.m. but only 178 lawmakers attended due to boycott.
1 sourceYonhap - May 7, 2026
Vote on constitutional amendment bill failed to reach required quorum of 191.
1 sourceYonhap - May 7, 2026
Presidential office expressed disappointment and urged participation in Friday session.
1 sourceYonhap - May 8, 2026
National Assembly plans to hold another plenary session for second vote attempt.
1 sourceYonhap
Potential Impact
- 01
A second vote attempt is scheduled for Friday in the National Assembly.
- 02
Rules governing future martial law declarations remain unchanged for now.
- 03
The constitutional revision process may extend beyond the planned June 3 local elections.
- 04
The presidential office will explore other legal paths for constitutional revision.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
BBC NewsTrump Meets Advisers to Decide on Iran Ceasefire Extension
President Trump said he is holding a Situation Room meeting to make a final decision on a possible deal with Iran. The proposed agreement would extend the ceasefire by 60 days and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump to Decide on Iran Deal in Situation Room Meeting
President Trump said Friday he is heading into the Situation Room to make a final determination on a potential agreement with Iran. The proposed deal would reopen the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and require destruction of Iran's highly-enriched uranium.
benzinga.comVietnam Clears Graves for Trump Organization Project in Hung Yen Province
Farmers in Hung Yen province are exhuming family graves to make way for a $1.5 billion Trump Organization development that includes hotels, villas and a golf course. The project, approved last year, has drawn local resistance over compensation levels and relocation of remains.