States Enact New Voting Laws Following Supreme Court Voting Rights Act Decision

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Wednesday in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana's second majority-Black congressional district constituted an unconstitutional racial gerrymander under the 14th Amendment. The majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, stated that "the Voting Rights Act does not provide a license to create racially gerrymandered districts" and requires plaintiffs challenging maps under Section 2 to prove intentional discrimination by states, not just discriminatory effects.

The decision reversed a lower court ruling that had ordered the creation of the district based on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

In response, Alabama Gov. " Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee called a special session beginning Tuesday to review the state's map, according to a statement from his office. U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn said in a tweet that "it's time to redraw lines that reflect Tennessee's conservative values," without specifying targeted districts.

In Louisiana, Gov. Jeff Landry issued an executive order on Thursday suspending the May 16 House primaries, citing the ruling's impact on the current map.

The ruling may influence redistricting in other states, though no immediate actions have been confirmed in Arkansas, Missouri, Mississippi, or South Carolina as of Friday, per state officials' statements reported in multiple outlets. Georgia Gov. " In a statement to Fox News, conservative commentator David Harris Jr.

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act has historically been invoked to create majority-minority districts, as in challenges by groups like the NAACP. The Supreme Court's decision specifies that such challenges must demonstrate "purposeful discrimination" rather than relying solely on results, referencing the 1980 Mobile v.

Bolden case where the Court required proof of intent, leading to a 1982 congressional amendment emphasizing effects.