politics
Supreme Court Rules in Voting Rights Act Case
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling narrowing the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by restricting claims of racial gerrymandering. States including Tennessee and Alabama initiated steps to redraw congressional maps, while Georgia declined changes for the current cycle.
AB
abcnews.go.comAudio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in the case known as Louisiana v. Callais, determining that certain applications of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in congressional redistricting were unconstitutional. Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion, stating that the ruling addresses challenges to maps based on racial gerrymandering claims.
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp said in a statement that the state will not redraw its congressional map before the 2026 midterm elections, noting that the primary is scheduled for May 19 and that any changes would disrupt the ongoing voting process. According to Politico, Kemp indicated that redistricting could be considered for the 2028 elections.
The Washington Times reported that Kemp described the ruling as providing clarity on redistricting standards.
Republican governors in Tennessee and Alabama announced special legislative sessions to review and potentially redraw congressional maps following the decision. RealClearPolitics stated that these sessions were called on Friday and represent initial steps toward adjusting districts in light of the ruling.
Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson told CNN's Victor Blackwell, "This is just Jim Crow 2.0," in response to the ruling. Former President Barack Obama issued a statement criticizing the decision, according to Fox News. In response, Black conservative commentator T.W. Shannon said on Fox News that Obama was "constantly whining" and that "race should not be a deciding factor in drawing districts."
An opinion piece in The Guardian by David Daley and Eric J. Segall stated that the Supreme Court's decision "wasn't about law – it was about politics" and could harm multiracial democracy. A piece in City Journal described the ruling as "striking a blow for voting rights sanity" by addressing issues in racial districting practices.
ABC News reported that the ruling limits the use of the Voting Rights Act, a law that has protected minority voting rights for six decades. The Washington Examiner noted that the decision has prompted states to weigh potential changes to maps ahead of the 2026 midterms, though no specific evidence of widespread election flux has been detailed in agency statements.
