politics
Supreme Court Strikes Down Louisiana Redistricting Map
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against racial considerations in congressional redistricting, invalidating Louisiana's 6th District map. Democrats defended their own redistricting plans as a response to Republican-led efforts in several states. The decision could prompt map revisions ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Fox NewsAudio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
Developing·Limited corroboration so far. This page will refresh as more sources emerge.
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision on May 1, 2026, striking down Louisiana's congressional map for the 6th District, which had been redrawn in 2024 to create a majority-Black electorate. The ruling prohibits states from using race as a factor in drawing districts, whether to disenfranchise voters or to aid minority communities in electing preferred candidates.
Democratic lawmakers described their redistricting efforts as a necessary counter to similar Republican initiatives. Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo., stated that Republicans initiated what he called a redistricting arms race, leaving Democrats no choice but to respond to protect democracy.
“I feel like the system is fundamentally broken, but let's be clear. Republicans began the redistricting arms race. And, so, Democrats are left with no choice but to level the playing field for the sake of democracy.”
Rep. Mark Takano, D-Calif., criticized the Supreme Court's decision as nefarious and accused Republicans of desperation to maintain power.
The decision follows redistricting actions in multiple states, including Texas, California, Utah, Missouri, Louisiana, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida. Florida state Rep. Angie Nixon attempted to disrupt the approval process by shouting on the House floor with a bullhorn.
Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, blamed Democrats for not responding at that time and criticized vulnerable Republicans in states like California for not opposing recent efforts in Texas.
