finance
Supreme Court Issues Rulings on Agency Removal, Tariffs, and Immigration
The court required statutory procedures for removing a Federal Reserve member and ruled that Congress holds authority over reciprocal tariffs. It also expanded presidential removal power over some agency heads and rejected a challenge to birthright citizenship.
AJ
nymag.comAudio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Slaughter that the president may remove heads of agencies previously protected by congressional statutes. The decision addressed statutory limits that had insulated certain agency leaders from at-will removal by the president.
On tariffs, the Court struck down the administration's use of emergency powers to impose reciprocal tariffs, holding that such authority belongs to Congress. The ruling addressed challenges to the administration's invocation of emergency powers for trade measures.
In immigration cases, the Court rejected an effort to end birthright citizenship, with five justices finding the plan violated the 14th Amendment. Four justices accepted parts of the administration's argument that the constitutional provision had been interpreted more broadly than its text requires.
The Court also gave the administration sole authority over Temporary Protected Status designations and allowed immigration agents to turn away asylum seekers before they reach U.S. soil.
The Court lifted restrictions on electoral spending, allowing unlimited donations to political parties following a challenge led by Vice President JD Vance. During the 2024-2025 term, the Court issued 63 unsigned shadow docket orders, exceeding the 56 merits decisions. These orders included lifting blocks on third-country deportations and ethnicity-based immigration stops.
