Tesla Reports Remote Operators Drove Two Robotaxis Into Objects
Tesla disclosed details of 17 robotaxi incidents between July 2025 and March 2026 in a federal database. In two cases in Austin, remote drivers took control of the vehicles and collided with a metal fence and a construction barricade at speeds under 10 mph. Safety monitors were present in the passenger seats during both incidents.
insurancejournal.comTesla has released new details about 17 robotaxi incidents that occurred between July 2025 and March 2026. The information was added to a federal database maintained by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The company reported that remote operators drove the autonomous vehicles in at least two of the crashes.
Both incidents took place in Austin with safety monitors seated in the passenger seats and no passengers aboard. The vehicles were traveling below 10 miles per hour at the time of impact. In the first case, from July 2025, a remote operator drove the robotaxi up a curb and into a metal fence at 8 mph after the safety monitor requested assistance because the car had stopped and would not proceed.
The safety monitor sustained minor injuries but did not require hospitalization. In the second incident, from January 2026, a remote operator took control at the safety monitor's request for navigation help and drove the vehicle into a temporary construction barricade at 9 mph.
The crash caused scrapes to the robotaxi's front left fender and tire, but the company reported no injuries. The details were first reported by TechCrunch. Tesla does not have a public relations team and did not respond to a request for comment. The reports highlight the role of remote operators who monitor and sometimes directly control autonomous vehicles when they encounter difficulties.
All U.S. self-driving operators maintain remote teams. Tesla allows its remote workers to drive the vehicles directly more often than some competitors. Other companies generally limit remote input to suggestions that the autonomous system can accept or reject.
One independent researcher said the incidents raise questions about what the teleoperator can see in both coverage and resolution, and what kind of latency they are experiencing while driving. Safety advocates have questioned remote driving because of potential issues with cellular connectivity and the need for remote drivers to have a complete view of the vehicle's surroundings.
Tesla's robotaxi service operates in Austin, Dallas and Houston with fewer than 100 vehicles in total. Less than half of the cars operate without a safety monitor in the passenger seat. Reuters reported this week that wait times in Houston and Dallas, where the service launched in April, can exceed 35 minutes.
In Austin, where the service has operated longer, robotaxis have sometimes been unavailable. The company is required by law to report certain crashes to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration database. It is not clear why the additional details about the Tesla incidents appeared in the database at this time.
In a separate incident reported in the database, a Tesla robotaxi made contact with a dog in September and pushed it into the path of an approaching van. The dog later appeared behind the van and was seen running away from the street. Tesla has focused on autonomous vehicles and robotics.
The company's chief executive has tied compensation targets to vehicle and robot deliveries, sales of self-driving subscriptions and the number of robotaxis in commercial operation.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
4 events- March 2026
Tesla adds details on 17 robotaxi incidents to federal database.
1 sourceWired - January 2026
Remote operator drives Tesla robotaxi into construction barricade at 9 mph in Austin.
1 sourceWired - September 2025
Tesla robotaxi makes contact with a dog that then runs away.
1 sourceWired - July 2025
Remote operator drives Tesla robotaxi into metal fence at 8 mph in Austin.
1 sourceWired
Potential Impact
- 01
The reports may prompt further scrutiny of Tesla's remote operation practices by regulators and safety groups.
- 02
Details could affect public perception of the safety of Tesla's robotaxi service in Austin, Dallas and Houston.
- 03
Competitors may highlight differences in their remote assistance approaches compared with Tesla's direct remote driving.
- 04
NHTSA may review the timing and content of Tesla's required crash reporting to the federal database.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
EuronewsWorld Urban Forum 2026 Draws 57,000 Participants from 176 Countries
The 13th World Urban Forum concluded with discussions on housing, climate resilience and urban governance. Organisers reported that the sessions informed future strategic priorities.
theverge.comTrump Mobile website still lists T1 phone as American-made
The product page for the T1 phone continues to describe the device as American-made. The Verge reported that the site may conflict with FTC advertising rules. The phone was announced in June 2025.
France 24EU Discusses Readiness for Artificial Intelligence Changes
A France 24 program examined whether European Union policies can address the effects of artificial intelligence. The discussion covered potential impacts across daily life and economic sectors.