Unbiased AI-powered news
President Trump handpicked a firm he said had worked on his own swimming pool to carry out a $6.9 million repair of the Reflecting Pool near the Lincoln Memorial. The contract was awarded without competitive bidding by using an exemption to federal procurement rules. The project includes painting the pool blue.
pbs.orgPresident Trump directed a no-bid contract worth $6.9 million to repair and paint the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool blue. Officials used an exemption to federal rules on government spending to steer the work to a firm the president said had previously worked on his own pools.
The project involves turning the water feature blue as part of the repair effort. The New York Times reported that the contract bypassed standard competitive bidding procedures.
The administration invoked an exemption that permitted selection of the contractor without soliciting competing bids. This approach violated typical requirements for how government money is spent on public projects. The firm was chosen directly by the president based on his stated familiarity with its prior work.
Federal procurement rules generally require open competition to ensure fair use of taxpayer funds and obtain the best value. In this case those rules were set aside through the exemption. The decision has drawn scrutiny over the process used to award the contract.
The precise shade or type of paint was not detailed in available reporting. Changing its color to blue represents a visible departure from its traditional look. No timeline for completion of the project was provided.
“Trump wants the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool painted blue. It is one of the most visited landmarks in the capital and frequently appears in photographs and public events. Previous repair projects have focused on structural integrity, water circulation and leak prevention. This latest effort adds an aesthetic element not present in earlier documented maintenance. The total cost of $6.9 million covers both the repair and the color change. The use of a no-bid contract on a prominent public monument has raised questions about adherence to standard government contracting practices. Officials have not released additional details on the specific exemption invoked or the firm's qualifications beyond the president's statement.”
These outlets didn't split into competing frames — coverage was uniform.
thegatewaypundit.comAuthorities detained William Lee Spartacus Falkner and Jordan W. Rincker on June 23 in connection with a planned assault using explosive drones and sniper fire at the UFC Freedom 250 event. The plot targeted President Trump and other officials on the White House South Lawn on Jun…
Japan TimesAn independent U.N. inquiry concluded that Israeli authorities and security forces deliberately targeted Palestinian children, constituting genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza, and war crimes in the occupied West Bank. The report examined violations against c…
nypost.comUS District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on Monday halted the Trump administration from consulting a revamped SAVE system. The 75-page ruling found the database violated statutory privacy protections and threatened voting rights. At least 25 states have scanned 67 million registrat…