politics
U.S. Judge Temporarily Blocks Sanctions on U.N. Rapporteur Francesca Albanese
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration's 2025 sanctions on Francesca Albanese violated the First Amendment by punishing her speech. The decision halts enforcement against Albanese and her husband, whose property and U.S. connections were targeted.
May 15, 1:45 PM·1m read1 source
thehindu.comAudio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
Developing·Limited corroboration so far. This page will refresh as more sources emerge.
U.S. N. Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese on Wednesday. Judge Richard Leon ruled that Albanese's family is "likely to succeed" in their First Amendment lawsuit against the government.
U.S. sanctions law.
U.S. Militaries. U.S. " Judge Richard Leon cited Marco Rubio's sanctions announcement as evidence that the sanctions were meant to punish mere speech.
Leon wrote: "Albanese has done nothing more than speak! " The State Department also sanctioned Albanese's husband, Massimiliano Cali, a World Bank economist. The department banned Massimiliano Cali from visiting the bank's headquarters in Washington.
Albanese and Cali were sanctioned under the same Executive Order 14203. Albanese's report urges the International Criminal Court and national judiciaries to investigate and prosecute corporate executives for their involvement in Israel.
N. Human Rights Council, with no real authority. The sanctions imposed concrete hardships. U.S. government seized Albanese's apartment in Washington.
She was frozen out of the bank account and insurance plan she shares with her husband. U.S. " The measures extended to her home country of Italy.
Hotels refuse to give Francesca Albanese bookings due to the sanctions. Foreign banks won't process Francesca Albanese's payments due to the sanctions. " The Albanese family's original complaint claimed the government was violating the Fourth Amendment by seizing their property without due process.
