Substrate
politics

Uganda Court Hears Prosecution Bid to Hide Identities of Witnesses in Besigye Treason Trial

Ugandan prosecutors told a court on Wednesday that opposition politician Kizza Besigye and two co-accused threatened six of ten planned state witnesses through an alleged accomplice. Chief State Attorney Joseph Kyomuhendo testified during cross-examination that the threats, which emerged in 2025, exist in electronic format identified by a forensic expert.

AllAfrica
1 source·May 7, 10:43 AM(1 day ago)·3m read
Uganda Court Hears Prosecution Bid to Hide Identities of Witnesses in Besigye Treason Trialfrance24.com
Audio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
Developing·Limited corroboration so far. This page will refresh as more sources emerge.

Prosecutors in Uganda's treason case against veteran opposition politician Kizza Besigye accused him and his co-accused of threatening state witnesses, as a hearing continued Wednesday on an application to conceal the identities of six out of ten witnesses the state intends to rely on.

The allegations emerged during the cross-examination of Chief State Attorney Joseph Kyomuhendo, who had sworn an affidavit supporting the application. AllAfrica reported that the threats reportedly emerged in 2025, yet the prosecution filed its application only in March 2026, more than two months after an order requiring disclosure of evidence had been issued.

The court, presided over by Criminal Division Judge Emmanuel Baguma, heard the case against Besigye, his aide Hajji Obeid Lutale, and Captain Denis Oola. Joseph Kyomuhendo alleged that the accused persons, through an alleged accomplice identified as Frank Kihehere, had issued threats to harm prosecution witnesses.

He told the court that the threats were actual and existed in electronic format, identified with the help of a forensic expert whose identity he declined to disclose.

Frank Kihehere allegedly issued threats to all six witnesses the prosecution now seeks to protect. Joseph Kyomuhendo argued that Besigye and his co-accused are likely to cause harm to the witnesses and their loved ones. He suggested that even Besigye himself could be among individuals the prosecution may consider for witness protection, although he did not elaborate.

During intense cross-examination by defense lawyers including Erias Lukwago, Bayan Turinawe, and Ernest Kalibala, Joseph Kyomuhendo declined to reveal how the electronic evidence was stored, downloaded, or transcribed. He refused to name the individuals involved in the process of handling the electronic evidence.

His knowledge of the alleged threats was derived from reviewing the police file and information provided by his supervisors at the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

Joseph Kyomuhendo, who heads the Anti-Human Trafficking Division in the Office of the DPP, was unsure whether any of the allegedly threatened witnesses had formally reported the threats to police. He could not confirm whether the witnesses were currently in hiding. The marathon cross-examination resumed at around 10 am on Wednesday and was still ongoing at the time of publishing.

State witness protection measures include remote testimony through video link, concealed witness booths, voice distortion, and physical shielding. Witnesses can also be placed in secure shelters, assigned bodyguards, and given strict guidance on their movements and interactions.

Joseph Kyomuhendo told the court that arms trafficking can form part of a treason offence, in response to questions regarding the nature of the charges against Besigye, Lutale, and Captain Oola.

Lawyer Major Simon Nsubuga is representing Captain Denis Oola and is expected to cross-examine Kyomuhendo after lawyers for Besigye and Lutale conclude their submissions. The defense questioned the timing of the application, noting the alleged threats dated to 2025 while the disclosure order came earlier.

Bayan Turinawe faulted the prosecution for failing to promptly fix the application for hearing, with the matter instead scheduled by the judge in the interest of expediting justice.

The defense argued that the delay in filing the application despite alleged threats dating back to January amounted to negligence. They criticized the prosecution for presenting the application without an investigator's report to substantiate the extent of the alleged threats.

Kyomuhendo responded that the witnesses had been safe until that time but struggled to explain why similar protection measures could not be implemented without concealing their identities.

Key Facts

Prosecution accuses Kizza Besigye and co-accused of witness
Threats allegedly made through Frank Kihehere to all six witnesses whose identities the state seeks to conceal; threats emerged in 2025 in electronic format ide
Application to conceal witness identities filed in March 202
Filed more than two months after court order for evidence disclosure; defense cites delay as negligence despite threats dating to 2025.
Joseph Kyomuhendo testifies on limited personal knowledge
Knowledge derived from police file and supervisors at Office of the DPP; unsure if witnesses reported threats to police or are in hiding; declined to name foren
Available witness protection measures detailed in court
Include video link testimony, concealed booths, voice distortion, physical shielding, secure shelters, bodyguards, and movement restrictions.

Story Timeline

6 events
  1. 2025

    Alleged threats against prosecution witnesses first emerged.

    1 sourceAllAfrica
  2. January 2026

    Order requiring disclosure of evidence issued.

    1 sourceAllAfrica
  3. March 2026

    Prosecution filed application to conceal identities of six witnesses.

    1 sourceAllAfrica
  4. 2026-05-06

    Hearing on witness identity concealment application ongoing.

    1 sourceAllAfrica
  5. 2026-05-07 10:00

    Marathon cross-examination of Joseph Kyomuhendo resumed before Judge Emmanuel Baguma.

    1 sourceAllAfrica
  6. 2026-05-07

    Cross-examination of Joseph Kyomuhendo still ongoing at time of publication.

    1 sourceAllAfrica

Potential Impact

  1. 01

    If identities concealed, trial may proceed with remote testimony or shielded witnesses, affecting transparency and defense preparation.

  2. 02

    Potential delay in treason trial proceedings as cross-examination continues and defense challenges evidence handling and timing of protection application.

  3. 03

    Defense criticism of prosecution delay and lack of investigator report could undermine credibility of threat claims before Judge Emmanuel Baguma.

Transparency Panel

Sources cross-referenced1
Confidence score75%
Synthesized bySubstrate AI
Word count567 words
PublishedMay 7, 2026, 10:43 AM
Bias signals removed2 across 2 outlets
Signal Breakdown
Loaded 2

Related Stories

Trump Administration Eases Hunting Rules in National Parks and RefugesBenzinga
politics53 min agoUpdated

Trump Administration Eases Hunting Rules in National Parks and Refuges

The Interior Department under Secretary Doug Burgum issued a January order directing managers at 55 National Park Service sites to remove what it called unnecessary barriers to hunting and fishing. Changes already implemented include allowing tree stands that damage trees, traini…

NA
The Washington Times
Benzinga
The Guardian
CBS News
+4
9 sources
Trump Administration Seeks to Revoke Citizenship of 12 Naturalized AmericansFox News
politics2 hrs ago

Trump Administration Seeks to Revoke Citizenship of 12 Naturalized Americans

The Justice Department on Friday filed denaturalization actions against a dozen foreign-born U.S. citizens accused of concealing terrorism ties, committing sex crimes, war crimes or immigration fraud. The cases mark a sharp increase in use of a rarely invoked process that prior a…

CBS News
The New York Times
Fox News
ABC News
4 sources
Judge Halts Termination of 1,400 NEH Grants Worth $100 MillionThe Guardian
politics53 min agoFraming68Framing risk68/100Rewrite inherits heavy consensus framing from sources by centering judicial rebuke of DOGE/Musk/Trump, repeatedly using loaded negative verbs and evaluative language while burying substantive policy debate.Click to jump to full framing analysis

Judge Halts Termination of 1,400 NEH Grants Worth $100 Million

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon declared on May 7, 2026, that Elon Musk’s DOGE used race, gender and protected characteristics to cut more than 1,400 National Endowment for the Humanities grants worth over $100 million. The ruling found the terminations violated the First and…

AB
The Guardian
CBS News
Hoover Institution
4 sources