Zimbabwe Moves to Merge Gender Commission into Human Rights Commission
The UN Working Group on discrimination against women and girls sent a formal communication to Zimbabwe questioning Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, which would dissolve the Zimbabwe Gender Commission. Cabinet approved the bill on 10 February 2026. The group conducted a country visit to Zimbabwe in August 2025.
themarketherald.com.auThe UN Working Group on discrimination against women and girls has sent a formal communication to the Zimbabwe government questioning plans under Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to dissolve the Zimbabwe Gender Commission. Zimbabwe's Cabinet approved the bill on 10 February 2026.
It was gazetted after the approval. Clause 18 of the bill seeks to repeal provisions establishing the commission while Clause 19 transfers its functions to the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission.
The UN Working Group conducted a country visit to Zimbabwe in August 2025 during which it acknowledged the commission's role but noted its operational challenges. could potentially risk deprioritising gender equality issues," the UN Working Group on discrimination against women and girls stated.
It stated that the change "would set a dangerous precedent and send a concerning message that the achievement of gender equality... " The UN Working Group reminded authorities that under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, known as CEDAW, states are required to take "all appropriate measures" to eliminate discrimination and gender-based violence.
"States have a fundamental obligation to pursue, without delay and by all appropriate means, a policy aimed at eliminating discrimination against women," it stated. "National machineries for the advancement of women... have been important in promoting implementation, monitoring and evaluation, advocacy, and mobilisation of support for policies that advance women," the Working Group stated.
The group stated that it was of the view that the absorption of the Gender Commission by the Human Rights Commission might further dilute resources granted to ensuring gender equality. AllAfrica reported that the UN experts asked the Zimbabwe government to clarify whether a gender-impact assessment was conducted.
The Working Group also asked whether stakeholders, particularly women's organisations, were consulted on the bill.
It requested details on how authorities intend to mitigate any negative consequences if the amendment is adopted.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
5 events- 2013
Zimbabwe Gender Commission created under the Constitution
1 sourceAllAfrica - August 2025
UN Working Group on discrimination against women and girls conducted country visit to Zimbabwe
1 sourceAllAfrica - 10 February 2026
Zimbabwe Cabinet approved Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3
1 sourceAllAfrica - 2026
Bill gazetted following Cabinet approval
1 sourceAllAfrica - 14 May 2026
UN Working Group sent formal communication questioning the bill
1 sourceAllAfrica
Potential Impact
- 01
Questions raised on stakeholder consultation and gender-impact assessment
- 02
Potential deprioritisation of gender equality efforts within government structures
- 03
Possible dilution of dedicated resources for gender equality work
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
The GuardianWHO Chief Visits DRC as Ebola Death Rate Reaches 30-50%
World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus arrived in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to support containment of a new Ebola outbreak. The agency revised the death rate to 30-50% based on confirmed cases and recorded 10 confirmed and 223 suspected d…
westernjournal.comGreek National Charged in UK With Aiding Iran-Linked Intelligence Service
A 46-year-old Greek man living in Germany was charged under the UK National Security Act with assisting an intelligence service believed to be Iran by targeting a journalist at Iran International.
upi.comSupreme Court Revives Havana Docks Lawsuit Over Confiscated Cuban Property
The U.S. Supreme Court sent a Helms-Burton Act case back to lower courts for further argument. The suit seeks damages from cruise lines that used docks seized by Cuba in 1959.