Substrate
Topic

privacy rights

8 stories related to this topic, newest first.

Federal Court Allows Plaintiff to Sue Under Pseudonym in Online Casino Casecalgaryherald.com
world11 days ago

Federal Court Allows Plaintiff to Sue Under Pseudonym in Online Casino Case

A federal court granted a plaintiff permission to proceed under a pseudonym in a lawsuit alleging illegal online casino operations. The plaintiff cited concerns over professional and reputational harm tied to her gambling addiction.

Reason
1 source
House Passes 3-Year Extension of FISA Section 702Substrate placeholder — needs review
politics29 days agoFraming55Framing risk55/100Rewrite inherits consensus framing on privacy risks and 'scrutiny' while presenting intelligence officials' warnings with named attribution only; lede centers legislative process over substantive surveillance powers.Click to jump to full framing analysis

House Passes 3-Year Extension of FISA Section 702

The U.S. House of Representatives approved a three-year renewal of Section 702 under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by a 235-191 vote. The bill, which allows warrantless surveillance of foreigners but raises privacy concerns for Americans, now moves to the Senate ahead…

FI
Politico
Just the News
NPR
CBS News
+1
6 sources
Congress Debates Reforms to FISA Section 702 Amid AI Surveillance Concernsdailyexcelsior.com
ai32 days agoDeveloping

Congress Debates Reforms to FISA Section 702 Amid AI Surveillance Concerns

Lawmakers are pushing for reforms to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, citing worries that artificial intelligence could enhance government surveillance of Americans' communications. A bipartisan group has introduced bills to require warrants for certain s…

Nbc News
1 source
Lawmakers Debate FISA Reforms and AI-Enhanced SurveillanceNbc News
technology33 days agoDeveloping

Lawmakers Debate FISA Reforms and AI-Enhanced Surveillance

U.S. lawmakers are pushing for reforms to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act due to worries that artificial intelligence could enhance government surveillance capabilities. A bipartisan group has introduced bills to require warrants for searching Americans'…

Nbc News
3quarksdaily.com
2 sources
Supreme Court Considers Constitutionality of Geofence Warrants in Bank Robbery CaseSubstrate placeholder — needs review
politics28 days agoDeveloping

Supreme Court Considers Constitutionality of Geofence Warrants in Bank Robbery Case

The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing whether geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment in a case involving a 2019 bank robbery. The warrants allow police to obtain location data from technology companies for devices near a crime scene. The case stems from the conviction of Ok…

AB
1 source
UK High Court Upholds Metropolitan Police's Use of Live Facial Recognition on London Transportblackenterprise.com
finance36 days agoDeveloping

UK High Court Upholds Metropolitan Police's Use of Live Facial Recognition on London Transport

The UK High Court dismissed a legal challenge against the Metropolitan Police's use of live facial recognition technology in London's transport system. The ruling paves the way for a national rollout across high streets and transport hubs. Separately, the UK Parliament passed a l…

ZeroHedge
1 source
New Civil Liberties Alliance Submits Amicus Brief in Fourth Circuit Case on Norfolk's License Plate Tracking Systembgr.com
business28 days agoDeveloping

New Civil Liberties Alliance Submits Amicus Brief in Fourth Circuit Case on Norfolk's License Plate Tracking System

The New Civil Liberties Alliance submitted an amicus curiae brief on April 20, 2026, in the case Schmidt v. City of Norfolk at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The brief urges reversal of a district court decision upholding the city's automated license plate reco…

Benzinga
1 source
Court Denies Petition to Seal 8-Year-Old Restraining Order Documentsthehindu.com
politics48 days ago

Court Denies Petition to Seal 8-Year-Old Restraining Order Documents

A court has denied a petition to seal documents from an 8-year-old restraining order. The petitioner cited his status as a public figure and concerns over impacts on employment, credibility, and safety. The ruling states that these factors do not justify sealing the records.

Reason
1 source