Georgia Judicial Commission Finds Two Supreme Court Candidates Violated Conduct Rules
The Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission determined that candidates Jen Jordan and Miracle Rankin violated judicial conduct rules by publicly endorsing each other and pledging to restore abortion rights. The findings became public after an 11th Circuit ruling allowed their release before Tuesday's election.
slate.comThe Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission determined that two candidates for the state Supreme Court violated judicial conduct rules by publicly endorsing each other and pledging to restore abortion rights if elected. According to a Monday report by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the commission's special election committee said it reasonably believes Jen Jordan and Miracle Rankin broke the Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct.
The code applies to judges and candidates for judicial office.
Jordan and Rankin are running in Tuesday's election to unseat incumbent Justices Charlie Bethel and Sarah Hawkins Warren. Both incumbents were appointed by former Republican Gov. Nathan Deal and won election in 2020. The commission formed a special committee during election years to review allegations of ethical misconduct in judicial campaigns.
A full investigation could follow the preliminary finding.
Jordan and Rankin filed a lawsuit under seal in early May seeking to block the commission from releasing its findings before the election. A federal district court initially sided with them, but the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 2-1 ruling that allowed the statements to become public.
The appeals court panel said the public would be harmed by not knowing about the allegations of misconduct. Judges Kevin Newsom and Robert Luck formed the majority, while Judge Embry Kidd dissented. Jordan and Rankin have each issued statements arguing the commission's findings are politically motivated.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
3 events- Early May 2026
Jordan and Rankin filed lawsuit under seal to block release of commission findings.
1 sourceThe Federalist - May 18, 2026
11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued 2-1 ruling allowing public release of findings.
1 sourceThe Federalist - May 18, 2026
Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported on the Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission findings.
1 sourceThe Federalist
Potential Impact
- 01
Voters will have access to the commission's findings before casting ballots on Tuesday.
- 02
A full JQC investigation could follow the preliminary determination.
- 03
Candidates may face additional scrutiny over their campaign statements.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
BBC NewsTrump Meets Advisers to Decide on Iran Ceasefire Extension
President Trump said he is holding a Situation Room meeting to make a final decision on a possible deal with Iran. The proposed agreement would extend the ceasefire by 60 days and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump to Decide on Iran Deal in Situation Room Meeting
President Trump said Friday he is heading into the Situation Room to make a final determination on a potential agreement with Iran. The proposed deal would reopen the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and require destruction of Iran's highly-enriched uranium.
benzinga.comVietnam Clears Graves for Trump Organization Project in Hung Yen Province
Farmers in Hung Yen province are exhuming family graves to make way for a $1.5 billion Trump Organization development that includes hotels, villas and a golf course. The project, approved last year, has drawn local resistance over compensation levels and relocation of remains.