Jan. 6 Officers Sue to Block Trump’s $1.8 Billion Fund
Two police officers who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6 filed suit in federal court to stop the Trump administration from distributing $1.8 billion to people who claim they were victims of prosecutorial overreach. The officers allege the fund is illegal and will compensate individuals who have threatened them.
ForbesU.S. Capitol during the Jan. 8 billion fund created by the Department of Justice. S. , names Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent as additional defendants. It seeks to halt the “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” which the administration says will compensate people who claim they suffered from weaponization of the justice system.
The original suit alleged an IRS employee improperly leaked Trump tax records. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously served as Trump’s criminal defense lawyer, created the fund under the settlement terms. The DOJ said the fund will provide a process to hear claims and issue formal apologies and monetary relief to qualifying applicants.
Lawsuit Claims The plaintiffs are former U.S.
Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn and active Metropolitan Police Department officer Daniel Hodges. Both officers were present at the Capitol when it was stormed by a mob of Trump supporters during the joint session of Congress confirming Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory.
“In the most brazen act of presidential corruption this century, President Donald J. ”
The officers allege the fund is illegal because no statute authorizes its creation and its design violates the Constitution and federal law. They claim the fund will compensate and empower people who have sent them death threats and confronted them since Trump issued broad pardons for Jan. 6 defendants.
Administration officials have said anyone who believes they were a victim of weaponization can apply, and an independent five-member commission will decide payouts. Vice President JD Vance told reporters on Tuesday that decisions would be made case-by-case and did not rule out payments to individuals charged with assaulting police officers.
Democrats in Congress have described the fund as a corrupt slush fund. The lawsuit remains pending in federal court.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
4 events- May 20, 4:03 PM ET
4 new sources added: nypost.com, @ABC, Associated Press, New York Post
4 sourcesnypost.com · @ABC · Associated Press - May 20, 2026
Two police officers filed suit in federal court to block the $1.8 billion fund.
3 sourcesCNBC · New York Times · Forbes - May 19, 2026
Department of Justice announced creation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund as part of IRS lawsuit settlement.
2 sourcesCNBC · Forbes - May 19, 2026
Vice President JD Vance said payouts would be decided case-by-case and did not rule out payments to some Jan. 6 defendants.
1 sourceForbes
Potential Impact
- 01
An independent commission will review applications for compensation under the fund.
- 02
The lawsuit could delay or prevent distribution of funds from the Anti-Weaponization Fund.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
BBC NewsTrump Meets Advisers to Decide on Iran Ceasefire Extension
President Trump said he is holding a Situation Room meeting to make a final decision on a possible deal with Iran. The proposed agreement would extend the ceasefire by 60 days and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump to Decide on Iran Deal in Situation Room Meeting
President Trump said Friday he is heading into the Situation Room to make a final determination on a potential agreement with Iran. The proposed deal would reopen the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and require destruction of Iran's highly-enriched uranium.
realitytea.comTrump Says U.S. Will Lift Iran Naval Blockade After Nuclear and Hormuz Pledges
President Trump stated the U.S. will end its naval blockade of Iran once Tehran commits to forgoing nuclear weapons and opens the Strait of Hormuz to unrestricted shipping. The announcement came via Truth Social and a live statement.