Unbiased AI-powered news
The group’s submission to the royal commission on antisemitism and social cohesion calls for greater focus on far-right extremism and warns that punitive laws and conflation of Jews with Israel can worsen the problem.
The GuardianThe Jewish Council of Australia submitted that far-right extremism and the conflation of Jewish identity with Israel are the main drivers of antisemitism in the country. The submission, made public this week, urges the royal commission on antisemitism and social cohesion to give more attention to the “often overlooked” threat from the far right and to recognize the diversity of views within the Jewish community rather than treating Jews collectively as representatives of Israel.
Sarah Schwartz, executive officer of the Jewish Council of Australia, stated that the “resurgent Australian far-right is a hotbed of antisemitism even as it weaponises Jewish grief to legitimise attacks on migrant communities and religious minorities”.
The submission identifies two key drivers: the “growth of far-right, neo-Nazi and conspiracist movements” and “the aggressive actions of the state of Israel and conflation of Jewish identity with Israel”. The submission argues that this conflation, which the state of Israel itself has long cultivated, causes direct harm to Jewish people worldwide when they are blamed for Israel’s actions.
It describes the Jewish Council of Australia as Australia’s largest progressive Jewish organisation, supporting human rights and Palestinian freedom and justice, with a membership of 2,500 people.
The royal commission, led by commissioner Virginia Bell, held its first block of public hearings in May and has received more than 16,000 submissions. A second block of hearings is scheduled from 29 June to 10 July and will focus on the drivers of antisemitism and hate speech, with particular attention to media and social media.
Other submissions presented to the commission have taken different positions.
Daniel Aghion, president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, has been critical of the Jewish Council of Australia and regards it as unrepresentative of the majority of Australian Jews. Jeremy Leibler, president of the Zionist Federation of Australia, has also shared his submission.
Vic Alhadeff, former chief executive of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, told the commission: “Jewish Australians have no agency in what the Israel Defense Force does, or indeed what the Israeli government does.
And yet so much of the manifestation of antisemitic incidents and attacks is interlaced with, and references, what is taking place on the other side of the world. ” Jillian Segal, the government’s special envoy to combat antisemitism, told the commission that conflation of the Israeli government with Jewish people was Australia’s “fastest-growing” form of antisemitism.
The Jewish Council of Australia argues that punitive legislation, conflation-reinforcing definitions, and the silencing of political dissent make antisemitism worse.
It states that evidence shows punitive approaches such as hate speech laws do not reduce racism, and warns of a “significant risk” that restrictions on pro-Palestinian speech and protest, when justified by invocations of Jewish safety, will backfire and weaken social cohesion.
The submission says the media amplifies extremists through “information laundering” and mainstreaming radical and racist messages. It calls for responsible reporting principles such as not interviewing extremists and blurring banners at protests.
theiranproject.comThe United States and Iran reached agreement on a roadmap to conclude their conflict within 60 days following high-level talks in Switzerland. Technical discussions will continue this week at Burgenstock resort under mediation by Pakistan and Qatar.
middleeasteye.netA Hebrew University survey found most Israelis view the recent conflict and subsequent agreement as a setback. The poll also recorded sharp drops in approval for the prime minister's handling of the campaign.