Substrate
politics

Chinese entities recruit for defence and policy OSINT roles via job sites, MI5 and Five Eyes bulletin says

Intelligence services from the UK, US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand say Chinese agents post analyst roles on LinkedIn, Indeed and Upwork to obtain non-public information from cleared personnel and military staff.

GB News
BBC News
2 sources·Jun 3, 5:26 PM·1m read
Chinese entities recruit for defence and policy OSINT roles via job sites, MI5 and Five Eyes bulletin saysriotimesonline.com
Audio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
Developing·Limited corroboration so far. This page will refresh as more sources emerge.

MI5 and the intelligence services of the Five Eyes alliance have warned that Chinese agents are posting analyst positions on job boards including LinkedIn, Indeed and Upwork to identify and recruit civil servants, military personnel and others with access to sensitive information.

The bulletin states that agents advertise foreign-policy or defence-analyst roles at what appear to be legitimate think tanks or private firms. After scanning submitted CVs, recruiters conduct virtual interviews while concealing their identities and ask candidates to prepare trial reports on topics such as China’s relations with other countries, defence or trade.

Candidates who complete the initial tasks are then pressed for more sensitive details and directed to encrypted messaging platforms. Recruits receive payments ranging from several hundred to several thousand dollars per report through online payment services.

The services said the targets include security-clearance holders specialising in defence, foreign affairs and intelligence, military personnel who have served in the Indo-Pacific, and academics, journalists and think-tank staff with links to policy or economic sectors.

Even without classified access, disclosure of government policy or military strategy can compromise national security, the bulletin said. China’s military intelligence services seek “privileged military, political and economic intelligence” that can give China a strategic and tactical advantage over the Five Eyes countries, according to the document.

The warning was issued as Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper concluded a state visit to China during which Foreign Office staff used burner phones because of security concerns.

Opposition figures criticised the timing. ” Cooper said she had raised Lai’s case during the visit and would continue to do so. “Our case remains we want to see his release as soon as possible, he’s a very elderly man,” she said.

Transparency

How sources framed this
GB NewsBBC News
LeftNeutralRightRoutine intelEspionage threat
CorroborationLimited · 2 sources

Story details

Related Stories

Brown Leads Husted 53-45 in Ohio Senate Race, Fox News Poll FindsThe Hill
politics1 hr ago

Brown Leads Husted 53-45 in Ohio Senate Race, Fox News Poll Finds

A Fox News survey of 1,015 Ohio registered voters found 53 percent support for the Democratic Senate nominee and 45 percent for the Republican nominee. President Trump's favorability in the state stood at 42 percent.

The Hill
The Washington Times
Fox News
3 sources
Senate Republicans Advance $70 Billion Border Security PackageABC News
politics1 hr ago

Senate Republicans Advance $70 Billion Border Security Package

The Senate cleared a procedural vote Wednesday for a nearly $70 billion border and ICE funding measure. Amendments targeting a now-defunct $2 billion Justice Department fund could alter the bill's path.

Fox News
ABC News
thegatewaypundit.com
redstate.com
4 sources
Supreme Court Allows FCC In-House Fines Against Wireless Carriers, Rejects Jury-Trial Challenge in 8-1 Rulingarstechnica.com
politics1 hr ago

Supreme Court Allows FCC In-House Fines Against Wireless Carriers, Rejects Jury-Trial Challenge in 8-1 Ruling

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the FCC can continue issuing initial penalties through internal proceedings. The decision resolves a split between appeals courts over AT&T and Verizon challenges.

The Guardian
Cnbc
The New York Times
3 sources