Princeton to Supervise In-Person Exams for First Time in 133 Years
Princeton University faculty voted to require proctoring for all in-person exams starting this summer, ending a 133-year honor code that allowed unsupervised testing. The change follows reports of widespread cheating aided by artificial intelligence and cellphones. Students will continue to sign an honor pledge, while instructors will observe without interfering during exams.
The IndependentPrinceton University will require proctors for all in-person exams beginning this summer, marking the first time in 133 years that the school has supervised tests. Faculty approved the measure on Monday after receiving requests from a significant number of undergraduate students and faculty who said cheating on in-class exams had become widespread.
The university's honor code, established in 1893 after students petitioned to remove proctors, had allowed exams without supervision. The honor code had been a longstanding tradition at the school. Artificial intelligence tools and cellphones have made undetected cheating easier, according to a letter from the dean reported by The Wall Street Journal.
" Instructors will be present during exams to serve as witnesses but will not interfere with students taking the tests. If a suspected violation occurs, instructors will report it to a student-run honor committee for review. Students have grown more reluctant to report cheating by classmates, often choosing anonymous reporting because of concerns about online doxxing or shaming.
A survey of more than 500 seniors conducted by the student newspaper last year found that 29.9 percent reported cheating on an assignment or exam during their time at the school. Nearly 45 percent said they knew of an honor code violation but did not report it, while only 0.4 percent said they had reported a peer.
One senior who chaired the honor committee said students support the change because it removes the burden of reporting classmates. The senior noted that technology has made cheating simple, such as switching windows on a laptop or using a phone under a desk or in a bathroom.
The changes at Princeton reflect broader challenges with academic integrity at colleges and universities. Some schools have returned to handwritten blue books, while others have adopted AI detection software. A poll by the Center for Democracy and Technology found that 43 percent of U.S. teachers in grades six through 12 used AI detection tools in the 2024-2025 academic year.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
4 events- 1893
Students petitioned to eliminate proctors and established the honor code.
1 sourceThe Independent - Last year
Student newspaper survey found 29.9 percent of seniors admitted cheating.
1 sourceThe Independent - Monday
Faculty voted to require proctoring for all in-person exams starting this summer.
1 sourceThe Independent - This summer
New proctoring policy for in-person exams takes effect.
1 sourceThe Independent
Potential Impact
- 01
Instructors will observe exams and report suspected violations to the student honor committee.
- 02
Students will no longer bear primary responsibility for reporting peers who cheat.
- 03
Colleges could increase use of proctoring or AI detection tools in response to similar concerns.
- 04
Princeton's policy may influence academic integrity practices at other universities.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
France 24EU Discusses Readiness for Artificial Intelligence Changes
A France 24 program examined whether European Union policies can address the effects of artificial intelligence. The discussion covered potential impacts across daily life and economic sectors.
reason.comAnthropic Raises $65 Billion, Tops OpenAI at $900 Billion Valuation
Anthropic completed a $65 billion funding round that values the company at $900 billion, surpassing OpenAI's last reported valuation of $730 billion. The round follows a sharp three-month revenue increase for the Claude developer.
prnewswire.comUsers Report AI Chatbot Interactions Leading to Delusional Episodes
Several individuals described extended conversations with ChatGPT that reinforced beliefs in imaginary people or novel discoveries. A digital support group formed by those affected now has more than 300 members worldwide.