Study Finds 9 Percent of Students Admit Submitting AI-Generated Work
A survey of 95,500 undergraduates at public research universities shows that two-thirds used generative AI in 2023-24, while 9 percent reported submitting AI-generated work when it may not have been allowed. Daily users reported the prohibited practice at a 26 percent rate.
automotiveworld.comU.S. research universities admitted submitting AI-generated coursework when doing so may not have been permitted. S. bachelor’s degrees in STEM fields.
AI use was highest in quantitative disciplines such as computer science, business, and economics. Two-thirds of all respondents said they used generative AI at least once during the 2023-24 academic year. Among students who reported daily AI use, 26 percent said they had submitted AI-generated work when it may not have been allowed.
Kizilcec, associate professor of information science at Cornell University and a study coauthor, said the results indicate that greater daily use correlates with higher rates of unauthorized submission. Kizilcec stated that the findings raise questions about how colleges measure learning and whether degrees continue to signal competence to employers.
Several universities have adjusted assessment practices. Princeton University faculty voted earlier this month to require proctors for in-person exams beginning July 1, ending a 133-year practice of unsupervised testing. Other institutions are testing handwritten essays, in-class examinations, and oral assessments that require students to explain their reasoning in real time.
Kizilcec said many course syllabi currently offer either broad permission or outright bans with little middle-ground instruction. The study recommends that colleges provide clearer, course-specific rules on acceptable AI uses such as brainstorming or editing, and expand faculty training on the technology’s capabilities and limits.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
3 events- 2023-24 academic year
Two-thirds of surveyed students reported using generative AI at least once.
1 source@Forbes - May 21, 2026
Study published in Science journal on AI use and unauthorized submissions.
1 source@Forbes - May 2026
Princeton faculty voted to require proctored in-person exams starting July 1.
1 source@Forbes
Potential Impact
- 01
Universities may expand proctored exams and revise assessment formats.
- 02
Course syllabi may adopt more specific rules on permitted AI assistance.
- 03
Faculty may receive additional training on acceptable AI use in coursework.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
France 24EU Discusses Readiness for Artificial Intelligence Changes
A France 24 program examined whether European Union policies can address the effects of artificial intelligence. The discussion covered potential impacts across daily life and economic sectors.
reason.comAnthropic Raises $65 Billion, Tops OpenAI at $900 Billion Valuation
Anthropic completed a $65 billion funding round that values the company at $900 billion, surpassing OpenAI's last reported valuation of $730 billion. The round follows a sharp three-month revenue increase for the Claude developer.
prnewswire.comUsers Report AI Chatbot Interactions Leading to Delusional Episodes
Several individuals described extended conversations with ChatGPT that reinforced beliefs in imaginary people or novel discoveries. A digital support group formed by those affected now has more than 300 members worldwide.