Unbiased AI-powered news
A federal trade court ruled President Trump’s 10% global tariffs unlawful, dealing a setback two months after they were imposed as a replacement for earlier duties struck down by the Supreme Court. Trump separately gave the EU until July 4 to implement a trade deal or face much higher tariffs. The administration plans to appeal the court decision immediately.
A U.S. trade court ruled on Thursday that President Trump’s 10% global tariffs are illegal, blocking the levies that were imposed two months earlier after the Supreme Court struck down prior broad tariffs. ” The ruling gives the administration five days to rescind the tariffs and requires refunds plus interest to affected importers.
The decision applies only to three plaintiffs — two private firms and Washington State — representing a small fraction of total U.S. imports. The court dismissed claims from other non-importer parties for lack of standing.
The tariffs struck down Thursday were instituted after the Supreme Court invalidated the earlier “Liberation Day” tariffs in February. Section 122 tariffs can remain in place for only 150 days and are scheduled to expire on July 24. The administration will appeal the ruling to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and seek a stay before the order takes effect on May 12.
Even if the ruling is upheld on appeal, judicial timelines suggest any final Supreme Court decision would likely come after the tariffs expire. The U.S. Trade Representative is conducting investigations under Section 301 that are expected to produce replacement tariffs on unfair trade practices before July 24.
The deadline came as European officials fell short of full agreement on the pact. Trump posted on Truth Social that he had spoken with the EU chief and agreed to the deadline tied to the U.S. 250th birthday. The statement was issued on the same day the trade court issued its ruling against the global tariffs.
The tariffs currently generate roughly $11-12 billion per month in customs duties. They account for slightly less than half of new tariffs put in place since the start of 2025 that remain in effect after earlier court losses.
Tariffs Expected Under Different Authorities Section
301 and Section 232 tariffs are expected to replace the Section 122 measures regardless of the court outcome. Authority under those statutes is considered more established and has been used continuously since the first Trump administration. If the ruling stands, the government could face additional refund obligations beyond the nearly $170 billion already owed from the February court decision.
The court sidestepped the broader question of whether the U.S. faces a fundamental international payments problem. The administration described the tariffs as a temporary stopgap while longer-term measures are prepared.
“Trump gives EU until 4 July to ratify trade deal or face ‘much higher’ tariffs”
These outlets didn't split into competing frames — coverage was uniform.
realitytea.comPresident Donald Trump said Monday the U.S. would strike Iran hard and could target the Pickaxe Mountain complex soon. He accused media outlets of favoring Iran and claimed its military had been destroyed. U.S. Central Command announced Tuesday it would resume a blockade of Irani…
realitytea.comSenators from both parties are waiting for President Donald Trump to publicly back a Russia sanctions measure developed by the late Sen. Lindsey Graham. The bill would penalize nations that purchase Russian oil and natural gas. Legislative text has not been released.
abcnews.go.comAndy Burnham secured 27 additional nominations on Monday, bringing his total to 349 and more than 85 percent of Labour MPs. The former Greater Manchester mayor is now positioned to succeed Keir Starmer as party leader and prime minister.