Substrate
politics

UK Government Considers New Cycling Offences After Fatal Collision

An 80-year-old woman died after being struck by a cyclist during a charity event in Greater Manchester. Ministers are reviewing proposals to introduce new offences for dangerous cycling that result in death or serious injury.

GB News
1 source·May 24, 6:59 AM·1m read
UK Government Considers New Cycling Offences After Fatal CollisionGB News
Audio version
Tap play to generate a narrated version.
Developing·Limited corroboration so far. This page will refresh as more sources emerge.

An 80-year-old woman died three days after being struck by a cyclist during a charity event in Stalybridge, Greater Manchester. Patricia Jenkins suffered a severe brain injury and broken ribs in the collision on Mottram Road last May. An inquest at Manchester South Coroner's Court heard that the cyclist had been travelling at least 27 mph on a downhill stretch where the posted speed limit was 30 mph.

Assistant coroner Anna Morris recorded the death as a wholly unintended and tragic accident.

Cramer, who led the police investigation, told the court there was not a realistic prospect of a prosecution. The court heard that UK law does not currently allow cyclists to be prosecuted for exceeding posted speed limits. Patricia Jenkins' husband, Anthony Jenkins, said the cyclist had carried a bike computer, Garmin watch, cycling apps and a camera, but police could not establish speed to a provable level.

He stated it was unbelievable that cyclists cannot be prosecuted for speeding.

The Government is considering amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill that would create new offences for dangerous cycling resulting in death or serious injury. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is expected to support replacing the 1861 offence of wanton and furious cycling.

A Department for Transport spokesperson said dangerous cycling is completely unacceptable and road safety remains a key priority. Josh Hughes, partner at law firm Bolt Burdon Kemp, said reckless cyclists who cause death or serious injury should not benefit from outdated laws, while noting that penalties alone are unlikely to improve safety without better infrastructure.

Transparency

Confidence65%

Reported by a single outlet. This score reflects source tier and factual specificity — corroboration is limited with one source.

Story details

Related Stories

Justice Department Abandons $1.8 Billion Anti-Weaponization FundFox News
politics33 min ago

Justice Department Abandons $1.8 Billion Anti-Weaponization Fund

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told Congress the department will not proceed with the fund. A separate agreement shielding President Donald Trump and his businesses from past IRS claims remains in place.

Cnn
CBS News
washingtontimes.com
dailycaller.com
Nbc News
+1
6 sources
**Trump Administration Scraps $1.8 Billion Compensation Fund**Associated Press
politics33 min agoUpdated

**Trump Administration Scraps $1.8 Billion Compensation Fund**

The Justice Department will not create a planned $1.8 billion fund intended to compensate people who say they were improperly targeted by federal law enforcement. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told lawmakers the department is abandoning the program entirely.

AF
Associated Press
DA
Semafor
Politico
+2
7 sources
Voters in Six States Hold Primaries to Set November FieldAl Jazeera
politics2 hrs ago

Voters in Six States Hold Primaries to Set November Field

Primary elections are underway in California, Iowa, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico and South Dakota. The contests will determine nominees for House, Senate and governor races ahead of the fall midterms.

Cnn
The Hill
RealClearPolitics
Al Jazeera
NPR
5 sources