Report Urges Review of Year 12 Assignments Over AI Use
A new report from education research consultancy Learning First finds that 75 percent of surveyed teachers report student use of artificial intelligence for assessments. The study draws on data from 3400 teachers and 750 school leaders and recommends an immediate review of unsupervised year 12 tasks.
A report by education research consultancy Learning First states that artificial intelligence tools are being used by students to complete assessments and that this practice poses risks to learning and to the credibility of qualifications such as the HSC.
The report draws on NSW Education Standards Authority survey data from 3400 teachers and 750 school leaders across public, private and Catholic schools. About 75 per cent of teachers said students used AI to complete assessments even though more than 80 per cent of schools restricted such use.
The report says the most pressing issue is year 12 assignments completed without supervision. It states that when students can access AI tools during internal assessment, the accuracy of the resulting information is brought into doubt. It calls for system leaders to review senior secondary assessment methods and to evaluate how susceptible those methods are to AI.
The report adds that when assessment at this stage is compromised, the entire education system loses credibility.
About half the teachers surveyed said they did not know how to stop students from using AI. The report notes that concerns were strongest among secondary teachers but says primary teachers should also prepare for emerging risks. NESA will use the report to develop advice for schools.
Its chief executive said the organisation has adjusted the All My Own Work program to address cheating rules and continues to discuss AI impacts with academic experts. Independent Schools NSW chief executive said many schools have moved from detection toward establishing guidelines and supporting ethical use of AI.
The report lists eight considerations for reform, including resisting unchecked spread of educational technology in schools.
Key Facts
Story Timeline
2 events- Report release
Learning First publishes findings from NESA survey of 3400 teachers and 750 leaders.
1 sourceThe Sydney Morning Herald - NESA response
NESA adjusts All My Own Work program and continues policy discussions on AI.
1 sourceThe Sydney Morning Herald
Potential Impact
- 01
NESA may revise year 12 assessment rules based on the report.
- 02
Schools could adopt new guidelines on supervised assessment tasks.
- 03
Teacher training programs may expand to cover AI detection methods.
Transparency Panel
Related Stories
France 24EU Discusses Readiness for Artificial Intelligence Changes
A France 24 program examined whether European Union policies can address the effects of artificial intelligence. The discussion covered potential impacts across daily life and economic sectors.
reason.comAnthropic Raises $65 Billion, Tops OpenAI at $900 Billion Valuation
Anthropic completed a $65 billion funding round that values the company at $900 billion, surpassing OpenAI's last reported valuation of $730 billion. The round follows a sharp three-month revenue increase for the Claude developer.
prnewswire.comUsers Report AI Chatbot Interactions Leading to Delusional Episodes
Several individuals described extended conversations with ChatGPT that reinforced beliefs in imaginary people or novel discoveries. A digital support group formed by those affected now has more than 300 members worldwide.