Unbiased AI-powered news
6 stories related to this topic, newest first.
Usa TodayThe U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on whether Monsanto must add a cancer warning to its Roundup weedkiller, following a $1.25 million verdict awarded to plaintiff John Durnell. The case examines if federal EPA regulations preempt state court lawsuits over labeling. The Trump…
ReasonThe U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 27, 2026, in Monsanto Company v. Durnell, a case challenging state lawsuits over glyphosate cancer risks. Justices expressed divided views on federal preemption under FIFRA. The ruling, expected this summer, could affect thousa…
CnbcThe U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that could block thousands of lawsuits alleging the herbicide Roundup causes cancer. President Trump issued an executive order in February 2026 to promote domestic glyphosate production, citing its importance to agriculture.
Washington ExaminerThe U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Monsanto v. Durnell, weighing whether federal pesticide law blocks state claims against Bayer for failing to warn about cancer risks from Roundup's glyphosate. Justices appeared divided, with some questioning the EPA's review process and…
The GuardianThe U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Monsanto v. Durnell, weighing whether federal law under FIFRA blocks state lawsuits claiming Bayer failed to warn about cancer risks from its Roundup weedkiller. Justices appeared divided on whether EPA approval preempts state labeling re…
The Supreme Court appeared divided during oral arguments on whether to block thousands of lawsuits claiming Bayer's Roundup weedkiller causes cancer. The case involves federal preemption of state failure-to-warn claims, with the Environmental Protection Agency's approval of label…